Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to xrpl-did-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables MCP hosts to verify agent spending mandates and receipts, providing stateless tools for authorization, chain verification, credential verification, and DID resolution.
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Mock identity-management MCP server for decentralized identity that allows minting DIDs, issuing signed Verifiable Credentials, and verifying them.
      8
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage identity, permissions, secrets, and verifiable proofs through a hosted MCP server, letting clients sign in and check what an agent may do before it acts.
      15
      27 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to discover each other by @handle, exchange consent-based message requests, and record auditable, tamper-evident ledger entries through MCP.
      7
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to generate and persist a self-sovereign did:key identity, sign claims about their actions as Ed25519 attestations, verify those attestations offline without any registry or network access, and compute an auditable reputation score from a ledger of events. All four operations are exposed as MCP tools so an agent can manage its own identity and prove its history during a session.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct ledger action or read: derive/resolve/publish/revoke for DIDs, issue/accept/revoke/get/list for credentials, plus account and transaction reads. Descriptions explicitly disambiguate the closest pairs (derive_did vs resolve_did, get_credential vs list_credentials, lookup_account vs lookup_transaction) with explicit 'use X instead' pointers.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all names follow verb_noun (derive_did, issue_credential, revoke_credential, lookup_account). The exceptions are publish_did_set, which is named after the ledger transaction type rather than a verb_noun, and the split between get_/list_/lookup_/resolve_ for read operations, which is readable but not perfectly uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    Twelve tools is well within a comfortable range and each one maps to a concrete step in the DID or credential lifecycle. Nothing appears redundant or padded; the read-only/write split also justifies separate tools.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is strong: DIDs have derive, publish (also usable to update the document), resolve, and revoke; credentials have issue, accept, read, list, and revoke; policy evaluation and account/transaction reads round it out. The main gap is transaction discovery — lookup_transaction requires a known hash and there is no way to list an account's transactions, so agents must obtain hashes elsewhere.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive