xrpl-did-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to xrpl-did-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for XRP Ledger identity features including DIDs, credentials, multisig, and safe transaction workflows.1223 npm1MIT

vantic-mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables MCP hosts to verify agent spending mandates and receipts, providing stateless tools for authorization, chain verification, credential verification, and DID resolution.Apache 2.0- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMock identity-management MCP server for decentralized identity that allows minting DIDs, issuing signed Verifiable Credentials, and verifying them.8-

Proofable MCPofficial
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage identity, permissions, secrets, and verifiable proofs through a hosted MCP server, letting clients sign in and check what an agent may do before it acts.1527 npmApache 2.0
Callsignofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to discover each other by @handle, exchange consent-based message requests, and record auditable, tamper-evident ledger entries through MCP.7Apache 2.0- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to generate and persist a self-sovereign did:key identity, sign claims about their actions as Ed25519 attestations, verify those attestations offline without any registry or network access, and compute an auditable reputation score from a ledger of events. All four operations are exposed as MCP tools so an agent can manage its own identity and prove its history during a session.Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 12 tools
Each tool targets a distinct ledger action or read: derive/resolve/publish/revoke for DIDs, issue/accept/revoke/get/list for credentials, plus account and transaction reads. Descriptions explicitly disambiguate the closest pairs (derive_did vs resolve_did, get_credential vs list_credentials, lookup_account vs lookup_transaction) with explicit 'use X instead' pointers.
Nearly all names follow verb_noun (derive_did, issue_credential, revoke_credential, lookup_account). The exceptions are publish_did_set, which is named after the ledger transaction type rather than a verb_noun, and the split between get_/list_/lookup_/resolve_ for read operations, which is readable but not perfectly uniform.
Twelve tools is well within a comfortable range and each one maps to a concrete step in the DID or credential lifecycle. Nothing appears redundant or padded; the read-only/write split also justifies separate tools.
Coverage is strong: DIDs have derive, publish (also usable to update the document), resolve, and revoke; credentials have issue, accept, read, list, and revoke; policy evaluation and account/transaction reads round it out. The main gap is transaction discovery — lookup_transaction requires a known hash and there is no way to list an account's transactions, so agents must obtain hashes elsewhere.