F
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceUnified MCP server for querying multiple LLM providers (Gemini, OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) with advanced routing, cost optimization, and fallback resilience.
2
3 npm
-
yuntu-mcp-server
by Drq112112Hjx
Related Servers
Alternatives to yuntu-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that routes AI chat requests to the best available provider (Anthropic, OpenAI, Groq, etc.) with automatic fallback, budget caps, and model-tier routing.MIT
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to interact with local LLMs via LM Studio, supporting dynamic chat, vision, RAG, file interaction, and model orchestration.28-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables interaction with OpenAI-compatible model proxy APIs through MCP, supporting text generation, vision understanding, and image generation with automatic model discovery and routing.3MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to search the Rapid Router model catalog, view prices in USD and INR, send chat completions, and check credit balances through an OpenAI-compatible API.-
- -licenseCqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables interaction with OpenAI-compatible APIs (like Ollama) through MCP tools. Provides access to chat completions, model listings, and embeddings generation from local or remote OpenAI-style endpoints.3-
TDQS
A3.9/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: chat_completion handles LLM interactions, get_balance checks token quota, and list_models shows available models. No overlap or ambiguity between them.
Naming Consistency5/5
All three tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case: chat_completion, get_balance, list_models. The naming is uniform and predictable.
Tool Count4/5
With only 3 tools, the surface is minimal but appropriate for a straightforward LLM gateway. It covers the essential actions (use model, check balance, list models) without unnecessary bloat, though a few more (e.g., channel management) could be expected.
Completeness4/5
The tool set covers the core user-facing operations for an LLM gateway: chatting, checking balance, and discovering models. It lacks administrative features like managing channels, but for the apparent consumer-focused scope, these are reasonable gaps.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues