Skip to main content
Glama
DrYe1109

MS-MCP

by DrYe1109

Related Servers

Alternatives to MS-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients like Codex to execute BIOVIA Materials Studio modeling, Forcite, DMol3, CASTEP jobs, GUI queues, and result reading through the official MaterialsScript runtime with isolated workspaces and security controls.
      32
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients like Codex to control Ansys Workbench and ICEM CFD locally, executing scripts, managing projects, and running simulations.
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for BIOVIA Materials Studio 2023 on Windows, providing controlled preparation of Forcite and CASTEP inputs, model building, and LAMMPS/VMD pre-processing with reproducible, auditable workflows and strict scientific boundaries.
      53
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to run materials computation workflows through tools for loading structures, relaxing potentials, screening doped variants, analyzing phonons and elasticity, sampling candidates, and replaying trajectories. It exposes these capabilities over stdio or streamable HTTP, adapting available engines and structure sources to the environment.
      118 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible clients to render, inspect, and diagnose OpenMoonRay scenes through a local MoonRay runtime, with support for interactive viewing, scene validation, and render comparisons.
      25
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to watch and drive a running ResInsight, query reservoir simulation models, and render pictures and plots without touching the GUI.
      GPL 3.0

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 24 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The ms_gui_*_current tools are mostly distinct, but ms_gui_apply_current overlaps with ms_gui_edit_current and ms_run_materialscript, and ms_castep/ms_gui_castep_current plus ms_forcite/ms_gui_forcite_optimize_current pair off by context rather than purpose. Descriptions help resolve most ambiguity, but a few boundaries remain blurry.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Names are consistently snake_case and the ms_gui_<verb>_current pattern is recognizable, but non-GUI tools mix verb_noun names, noun-only status names, and bare product names like ms_castep and ms_forcite. The convention is readable but not uniform.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 24 tools, this server sits in the heavy 16-25 range, though the breadth covers environment checks, script execution, GUI structure editing, multiple simulation engines, and remote batch tracking. A smaller, more focused set would likely be easier for agents to navigate.

    Completeness2/5

    The descriptions repeatedly instruct agents to first try ms_gui_find_cif_import_current, but that tool is not present in the server, creating a dead end in the structure-creation workflow. There is also no general local job status or result retrieval tool for the non-remote CASTEP and Forcite runs.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues