Skip to main content
Glama
pentool-mcp-server
by DrXOps

Related Servers

Alternatives to pentool-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for offensive-security tooling, enabling AI agents to run reconnaissance, CVE intelligence, JavaScript analysis, HTTP probing, and port scanning against authorized targets.
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to drive professional penetration-testing workflows—subdomain enumeration, host probing, content fuzzing, vulnerability scanning, brute-force, traffic capture, and exploitation sweeps—through a single MCP interface with stdio, Streamable HTTP, and legacy SSE transports plus bearer/OIDC auth. It also records engagement artifacts and generates client-ready reports with scope handling, cutting manual pentest administration.
      165 npm
      GPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      D
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that integrates essential penetration testing tools (Nmap, Gobuster, Nikto, John the Ripper) into a unified natural language interface, allowing security professionals to execute and chain multiple tools through conversational commands.
      9
      165 npm
      149
      AGPL 3.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes over 20 standard penetration testing utilities, such as Nmap, SQLMap, and OWASP ZAP, as callable tools for AI agents. It enables natural language control over complex security workflows for automated and interactive penetration testing.
      115
      -

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: 'generate' for LLM inference, 'health' for readiness checking, and 'configure' for setting parameters. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names are simple, lowercase verbs that accurately describe their action ('generate', 'health', 'configure'). The pattern is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 3 tools, the count is appropriate for a minimal MCP server focused on LLM inference. It could potentially benefit from a status tool or a list-models tool, but the current set is sufficient for its core purpose.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool surface covers basic lifecycle: configure (setup), health (readiness), and generate (infer). However, there is no tool for cancelling generation, listing available models, or inspecting current configuration, which are notable gaps for a production server.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues