pentool-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to pentool-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for offensive-security tooling, enabling AI agents to run reconnaissance, CVE intelligence, JavaScript analysis, HTTP probing, and port scanning against authorized targets.10MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI clients to drive professional penetration-testing workflows—subdomain enumeration, host probing, content fuzzing, vulnerability scanning, brute-force, traffic capture, and exploitation sweeps—through a single MCP interface with stdio, Streamable HTTP, and legacy SSE transports plus bearer/OIDC auth. It also records engagement artifacts and generates client-ready reports with scope handling, cutting manual pentest administration.165 npmGPL 3.0
- AlicenseDqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that integrates essential penetration testing tools (Nmap, Gobuster, Nikto, John the Ripper) into a unified natural language interface, allowing security professionals to execute and chain multiple tools through conversational commands.9165 npm149AGPL 3.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes over 20 standard penetration testing utilities, such as Nmap, SQLMap, and OWASP ZAP, as callable tools for AI agents. It enables natural language control over complex security workflows for automated and interactive penetration testing.115-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that connects an LLM via Ollama to security tools for autonomous or guided penetration testing from a terminal interface.14GPL 3.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for TurboPentest — run AI-powered penetration tests and review findings from your coding assistant.1268 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: 'generate' for LLM inference, 'health' for readiness checking, and 'configure' for setting parameters. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
All tool names are simple, lowercase verbs that accurately describe their action ('generate', 'health', 'configure'). The pattern is uniform and predictable.
With 3 tools, the count is appropriate for a minimal MCP server focused on LLM inference. It could potentially benefit from a status tool or a list-models tool, but the current set is sufficient for its core purpose.
The tool surface covers basic lifecycle: configure (setup), health (readiness), and generate (infer). However, there is no tool for cancelling generation, listing available models, or inspecting current configuration, which are notable gaps for a production server.