x402-pilot
Related Servers
Alternatives to x402-pilot
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables agents and IDE assistants to validate x402 payment endpoints without shelling out: it fetches a URL unpaid and returns a conformance report on the returned 402 challenge, decodes and classifies base64 payment blobs, and summarises which scheme/network pairs a facilitator can settle.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that checks an x402 paid endpoint before an agent pays it, and checks afterwards that the receipt opens to exactly one real on-chain settlement. Two tools, no account, no API key.2486 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenancePreflights x402 payment terms and provides an MCP server/API for checking Base USDC payments, tokens, wallets, and transactions before an agent pays.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables agents to validate x402 endpoints and review on-chain payment evidence before relying on them, with free initial checks and automated USDC payments under configurable safety limits.35 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables linting the unpaid path of an x402 endpoint by fetching a paid URL or inspecting a payment-required challenge you already hold, returning a verdict with severity-tagged findings, fixes, and a list of what went untested. Checks challenge fields, transport behavior, and discovery documents without ever signing or paying.2 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables autonomous agents to inspect and audit unfamiliar x402 endpoints before spending USDC, using bounded read-only probes to surface payment challenges, pricing, network, receiver, and operational signals without signing or spending funds.-
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a distinct artifact: PaymentRequired decoding, PAYMENT-RESPONSE inspection, code compliance scanning, spec linting, extension validation, and end-to-end conformance runs. The decode_402 vs inspect_payment_response pair could be momentarily confused, but descriptions clearly split request-side vs response-side, and run_conformance is clearly an orchestrator over the others.
All tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (check_compliance, lint_scheme_spec, validate_extension, run_conformance). decode_402 is the only minor deviation, embedding a number instead of a noun, but it remains readable and predictable.
Six tools is well-scoped for an x402 validation/compliance toolkit, with each tool covering a distinct stage of the protocol surface. No bloat and no obviously missing companion tool given the read-only, no-keys design.
The surface covers parsing 402 requests, inspecting responses with on-chain recomputation, spec linting, extension validation, code compliance, and conformance sequencing—a broad lifecycle. Minor gaps exist (no payment construction/signing), but that omission is deliberate given the server holds no keys.