Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to MegaLinter MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables dependency, security, and coding convention checks for Python and Java projects via MCP tools. Supports local paths or Git URLs.
      -
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive code quality tools including linting, security scanning, TypeScript checking, and testing through a single MCP server. Integrates multiple quality analysis tools like Biome, ESLint, and Playwright for streamlined development workflows.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides MCP tools for local code validation with execution evidence, enabling users to run planned checks on projects and receive JSON results that distinguish passing, failing, and incomplete outcomes.
      34 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides deterministic local development tools over stdio MCP, including repository mapping, code review, secret and dependency scanning, release checks, whitelisted checks, scaffolding, and workflow state tracking.
      185 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Multiple tools are direct aliases (e.g., help_quick and megalinter_help_quick; parse, scan, summary for megalinter_quick_action), creating ambiguity about which to use. While the descriptions mention the aliasing, it adds unnecessary overlap.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools follow a consistent megalinter_verb_noun pattern, but the inclusion of aliases like help_quick, parse, scan, and summary breaks the pattern, mixing short and full names.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 15 tools, the count is at the high end of well-scoped. However, some tools are redundant due to aliases, so not every tool earns its place, but overall the scope is reasonable.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core lifecycle: listing, running, parsing reports, writing config, and security recommendations. Minor gaps like updating config or managing multiple runs are absent, but essential functionality is present.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues