Fathom AI MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Fathom AI MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceConnects AI assistants to the Fathom meeting recording API to retrieve meeting summaries, transcripts, and action items.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying meeting transcripts, summaries, and action items from Fathom directly in your MCP-compatible AI assistant, eliminating context switching while coding.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI assistants access to Fathom meeting recordings, summaries, and transcripts via tools like list_meetings, get_meeting_summary, and get_meeting_transcript.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes the Fathom AI meeting intelligence API to Claude, allowing users to list meetings, fetch transcripts, and retrieve summaries. It also enables management of teams and members through the Model Context Protocol.45 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceConnects AI tools to Fathom meeting transcripts, summaries, and action items via a single API key.67 npmMIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables access to Fathom.video meeting data including AI-generated transcripts, summaries, and action items. Supports searching meetings, exporting to markdown, and managing webhooks through natural language in Cursor IDE.1154 npm6MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: meetings, summaries, transcripts, teams, team members, and webhooks. Even though get_summary and get_transcript both retrieve meeting content, their purposes are clearly different and list_meetings can include optional content without overlapping directly.
All tool names follow the verb_noun pattern with lowercase and underscores, such as list_meetings, get_summary, and create_webhook. There are no mixed conventions or vague verbs, making the API predictable.
The 7 tools are well-scoped for a meeting AI assistant covering the core actions of browsing meetings, retrieving content, listing teams, and managing webhooks. The count is neither too sparse nor excessive.
The core workflow of listing meetings and retrieving summaries/transcripts is well-covered, along with team management and webhook lifecycle. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit list_webhooks or update_meeting, but these are not critical for the primary use case.