Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to AI Website Check

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables auditing any public website, returning a scored plain-English report that flags issues costing customers, covering speed, phone experience, search visibility, contact options, writing quality, and modernity.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Checks whether a website is readable and citable by AI search engines — llms.txt, Schema.org structured data, AI-bot access in robots.txt, content freshness, answer directness, E-E-A-T signals, plus a LocalBusiness Rich Results validator. Free, no API key, remote Streamable HTTP.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables users to scan a website, project folder or HTML file for generic AI-generated copy, template design and unfinished details, scoring each finding with file-and-line evidence and a per-page breakdown. It turns the results into phased, step-by-step repair plans that Claude, Cursor and other AI tools can apply, then re-measures the score after each change.
      8
      70 npm
      12
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Audits a live site for machine legibility (structured data, llms.txt, titles, headings), matches a trade to one of 14 website templates with demo links, and quotes real prices. Remote Streamable HTTP on MCP spec 2026-07-28, with an eval suite in the repo.
      3
      66 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to interrogate ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini with buyer questions and live web search to learn whether a business is recommended, ranked, competing with others, and having its website cited. Returns structured findings and estimated provider costs.
      1
      138 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusing it with another. Its purpose is clearly described and distinct.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool uses a clear verb_noun pattern (check_website) in snake_case. No inconsistency exists because there are no other names to compare.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool for an entire website-checking workflow is borderline thin. While the tool itself is comprehensive, the surface offers no granularity for separate checks or stages.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool covers the key customer-journey aspects: Google listing, mobile view, services, pricing, hours, calling, address, trust, and inquiry. It reports where customers get stuck and respects read-only and robots.txt constraints, leaving no obvious gap for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessSyncing