Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to echolon

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Local-first backtesting engine with built-in overfitting detection (PBO, deflated Sharpe, bootstrap CI, walk-forward) and a native MCP server for AI agents to validate trading strategies.
      4
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Pyon trading platform that lets AI agents search markets, generate research, build and edit node-graph strategies, run backtests, diagnose problems, and optimize parameters with 2-D sweeps.
      13
      10 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for the FLOX trading framework. About 30 tools to run backtests, scaffold strategies, validate for lookahead bias, compute indicators, place orders, and query PnL from Claude/Cursor.
      38
      224
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Full-lifecycle algorithmic trading MCP server. AI strategy generation from plain English, backtesting, live bot deployment to 10+ brokers, portfolio monitoring, and prediction markets. Stocks, options, crypto, futures. 32 tools. Free tier.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An extensible framework that exposes quantitative research functions and financial data connectors, such as FRED, via an MCP server. It enables users to perform complex financial modelling, data retrieval, and autonomous research loops with built-in guardrails and pluggable components.
      6
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: API introspection, parameter generation, documentation retrieval, catalog listing, scaffolding, and various validation checks. Overlap among validation tools is resolved by specific validation targets (integration, logging, protocol, parameters, etc.).

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tools follow a mostly consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., get_doc, list_indicators, validate_strategy). Minor deviations like 'indicator_info' instead of 'get_indicator_info' and 'suggest_similar' instead of 'get_suggestions' are tolerable.

    Tool Count5/5

    23 tools cover a comprehensive set of operations for a strategy framework: API description, parameter generation, documentation, catalog browsing, scaffolding, and multiple validation checks. The count is well-scoped for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers key development and validation workflows. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool for creating a new strategy directory or running backtests), but the core lifecycle of building and validating components is well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessSyncing