Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ooxml-integrity

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Validates Excel (.xlsx) workbooks against reviewed, lockable acceptance contracts, catching errors and outputting structured issues that agents can repair.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables measuring and fixing the page layout of .docx documents by driving Microsoft Word or LibreOffice, including page counts, section outlines, text search, paragraph formatting, field updates, and PDF export.
      13
      GPL 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to inspect generated .docx and .pdf files before delivery, extracting structural, typographic, spacing, and language facts so formatting errors can be caught automatically.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Converts documents among PDF, DOCX, Markdown, plain text, and images while returning fidelity reports that clearly distinguish PASS, FAIL, NOT_CHECKED, and UNSUPPORTED outcomes. Also enables lossless reading, exact search, and structured extraction from long documents without treating unchecked content as passed.
      16
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for reading, editing, and validating Microsoft Word documents with specialized support for track changes, comments, and footnotes. It enables structural auditing, heading extraction, and precise OOXML-level document manipulation through natural language tools.
      10
      100
      1,113 PyPI
      67
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: `check` audits a single file in isolation, while `compare` adds differential analysis against an original. The descriptions explicitly state when to use each (use compare when the original is available; check otherwise) and even cross-reference each other, leaving no real ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both names are single imperative verbs in the same style (`check`, `compare`), forming a clean, predictable pair. There is no mixing of conventions, camelCase, or noun/verb inconsistency.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is on the thin side for the surface, though the server's scope is narrow (integrity auditing of OOXML files). The pair covers the core mode split, but a smaller-than-typical set leaves little room for adjacent operations like batch checking or repair.

    Completeness4/5

    The lifecycle of an integrity audit is covered: standalone checking plus comparison against an original, with expectations handling intentional removals and PPTX limitations documented. Minor gaps exist—no batch/multi-file operation and no remediation or report-export tool—but agents can work around them by invoking the CLI per file.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues