unlike_post
Remove a like from a specific post by providing its ID.
Instructions
投稿のいいねを取り消す。対象の「投稿ID」を指定する。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| post_id | Yes | いいねを取り消す投稿のID |
Remove a like from a specific post by providing its ID.
投稿のいいねを取り消す。対象の「投稿ID」を指定する。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| post_id | Yes | いいねを取り消す投稿のID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description only says it cancels a like, without disclosing side effects or prerequisites (e.g., whether the post must be liked first, idempotency, error handling).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences, no wasted words, concise and to the point.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description covers the core action. Could mention idempotency or state requirements, but overall adequate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%. The description mentions 'post ID', but adds no new information beyond the schema's parameter description. Baseline 3 for full schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (cancel like) and the resource (post). It implicitly differentiates from sibling 'like_post' by being the opposite operation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The context is clear given the sibling tool 'like_post', but no explicit when-to-use, when-not, or alternatives are stated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Divedesign/elyth-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server