Skip to main content
Glama
Context Memory MCP Server

Context Memory MCP Server

by Dithilli

Related Servers

Alternatives to Context Memory MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Captures user corrections and improvements during interactions, logs them, finds recurring patterns, and prescribes preventive fixes like CLAUDE.md rules, skills, scripts, or MCP tools to avoid repeating mistakes.
      4 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Engineering memory for Claude Code — prevents re-investigating solved problems and repeating rejected architectural decisions across sessions and projects.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Daem0n-MCP provides AI agents with persistent, semantically indexed memory to track decisions, rules, and outcomes across sessions. It actively prevents repetitive mistakes by enforcing context checks and prioritizing information about past failures during recall. Best for Claude Code.
      11
      75
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code sessions to persist identity and cross-session memory through a local SQLite store with semantic search, so past facts, decisions, and lessons can be recalled by meaning. It also detects and classifies user corrections into behavioral patterns that progress from new to internalized, letting reflection cycles evolve skills that work over time.
      6 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides Claude Code with cross-session memory, semantic recall of facts and decisions, and tracking of user corrections as behavioral patterns. Enables persistent identity, self-evaluation, and framework evolution so the assistant learns from past sessions.
      6 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action: recording failures, recording solutions, searching, and exporting. The descriptions clearly differentiate the purposes, so selection ambiguity is low.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    The tool names use mixed conventions: 'recall' and 'promote' are verbs, while 'mistake' and 'learned' are nouns/past participles. There is no consistent verb_noun pattern, making it harder to predict tool behavior from the name.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for a memory/learning management server, covering the core operations without excessive fragmentation.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers recording (mistakes/learnings), recall, and promotion to permanent storage, but lacks update and delete operations for managing existing memories. This leaves a notable gap for correcting or removing outdated information.