Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Capes

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, search, send, manage, schedule, and analyze email across multiple IMAP/SMTP accounts from a single server. It also supports drafts and templates, provider-aware labels, real-time inbox watching with triage, verification-code capture, calendar extraction, and email analytics over stdio or Streamable HTTP.
      28 npm
      ISC
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Unified email orchestration server for Gmail and Outlook with agentic tools for sending, reading, searching, and managing emails, enabling assistant-driven email workflows.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, search, send, manage, schedule, and analyze mail across multiple IMAP/SMTP accounts, with real-time inbox watching, verification-code capture, calendar extraction, and provider-aware labeling. It also exposes drafts, templates, bulk operations, analytics, and OAuth2 support over stdio or Streamable HTTP.
      28 npm
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI apps to search, read, summarise, thread, flag, file, draft, send and open attachments in IMAP and SMTP mailboxes, with each user signing in to their own mailbox. Self-hosted and bound to operator-configured mail servers, it keeps passwords sealed inside per-connection tokens so every tool call acts only as the mailbox owner.
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely read, search, and send email across IMAP and Microsoft Graph accounts, with scoped tokens, approval flows, and an audit trail.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 62 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are mostly cleanly separated by service and resource+action, e.g. Discord message/channel/role operations and Gmail message/draft/label operations. A few boundaries blur—discord_edit_channel/delete_channel also handle threads while thread creation is separate, and gmail_modify overlaps with trash/spam/archive—but descriptions clearly differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Strong service_action naming with snake_case throughout (discord_*, gmail_*, twitter_search). Most names follow verb_noun, but a handful are noun-only or vague (discord_member_role, discord_thread_member, gmail_modify, gmail_trash), which is a minor deviation rather than chaos.

    Tool Count1/5

    62 tools is far beyond the 3–15 well-scoped range and sits in the rubric's 50+ extreme-mismatch band. Even split across Discord, Gmail, and Twitter, the surface is very large and likely to burden tool selection.

    Completeness4/5

    Discord coverage is deep across messages, channels, roles, members, threads, invites, webhooks, moderation, and audit logs; Gmail covers search, read, send, reply, forward, labels, drafts, and message state. Minor gaps remain (e.g., Twitter is search-only, and there is no direct Discord message search or Gmail draft retrieval), but core lifecycle workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues