Capes
Related Servers
Alternatives to Capes
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceUnified email orchestration server for Gmail and Outlook with agentic tools for sending, reading, searching, and managing emails, enabling assistant-driven email workflows.2-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage multiple email accounts with secure credentials, local full-text search, thread-aware replies, and automation.4 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to securely read, search, and send email across IMAP and Microsoft Graph accounts, with scoped tokens, approval flows, and an audit trail.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Gmail accounts, including searching, reading, sending, replying, forwarding, attachments, labels, and drafts across multiple mailboxes on a self-hosted Cloudflare Worker.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that lets AI assistants send, read, and manage Gmail through natural language, including email sending, inbox management, and template-based outreach.111 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search, read, send, reply, forward, and organize Gmail messages and threads across multiple Google accounts via a self-hosted Cloudflare Worker.146 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 62 tools
Tools are mostly cleanly separated by service and resource+action, e.g. Discord message/channel/role operations and Gmail message/draft/label operations. A few boundaries blur—discord_edit_channel/delete_channel also handle threads while thread creation is separate, and gmail_modify overlaps with trash/spam/archive—but descriptions clearly differentiate them.
Strong service_action naming with snake_case throughout (discord_*, gmail_*, twitter_search). Most names follow verb_noun, but a handful are noun-only or vague (discord_member_role, discord_thread_member, gmail_modify, gmail_trash), which is a minor deviation rather than chaos.
62 tools is far beyond the 3–15 well-scoped range and sits in the rubric's 50+ extreme-mismatch band. Even split across Discord, Gmail, and Twitter, the surface is very large and likely to burden tool selection.
Discord coverage is deep across messages, channels, roles, members, threads, invites, webhooks, moderation, and audit logs; Gmail covers search, read, send, reply, forward, labels, drafts, and message state. Minor gaps remain (e.g., Twitter is search-only, and there is no direct Discord message search or Gmail draft retrieval), but core lifecycle workflows are covered.