Skip to main content
Glama
Dianel555

Gemini SuperClaude MCP Server

by Dianel555
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Gemini SuperClaude MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Gemini CLI MCP Server

      centminmod
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Bridges Google's Gemini CLI with MCP-compatible clients and integrates OpenRouter API for access to 400+ AI models. Provides 33 specialized tools enabling multi-AI workflows, collaborations, and debates between Claude, Gemini, and other LLMs.
      142
      -

    • Boring Gemini

      Boring206
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An autonomous AI development agent that enables full-stack coding, automated verification, RAG-powered code search, and quality assurance through MCP tools. Supports Gemini CLI, Claude Code CLI, with features like parallel verification, security scanning, and spec-driven development.
      5
      -

    • all-agents-mcp

      Dokkabei97
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables orchestrating multiple AI CLI agents (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Copilot CLI) through a unified MCP interface for task delegation, cross-agent comparison, and specialized tools like code review and debugging.
      14
      4 npm
      14
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools cover a wide range of distinct functionalities (analysis, development, planning, operations, etc.), and their descriptions clearly differentiate between them. However, there is minor overlap between some tools like 'improve' and 'cleanup', and 'reflect' and 'analyze' could be confused, but overall an agent can distinguish them.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All tools use the 'sc:' prefix and lowercase with hyphens for multi-word names, which is consistent. However, the pattern mixes verbs (analyze, build, test) and nouns (cleanup, git, task), lacking a uniform verb_noun structure. This inconsistency can be slightly confusing but still readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 22 tools, the server is quite extensive for a single MCP server. While each tool serves a distinct purpose, the sheer number may be overwhelming and borderline excessive for typical use cases. A more focused set might be better.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers a broad range of project lifecycle needs: analysis, planning, implementation, testing, documentation, maintenance, and session management. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no deployment or configuration management), but overall it provides a comprehensive suite for software development assistance.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources