MCP Verdict MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCPVERDICT_BASE_URL | No | Set MCPVERDICT_BASE_URL to point at another copy of the site (for example a staging install). |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| search_serversA | Search MCP Verdict's reviewed MCP servers by name, category, or capability (e.g. 'postgres', 'browser automation', 'oauth'). Omit the query to list every reviewed server. Returns verdict, one-paragraph summary and review URL. |
| get_server_reviewA | Get MCP Verdict's review of one MCP server: verdict, evaluation date, section list, and content. Pass |
| get_guideA | MCP Verdict's setup guides (e.g. Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor), MCP client profiles, and comparisons (e.g. 'best MCP servers', 'MCP vs API'). Omit |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The three tools target clearly distinct resources: a server directory search, a guide lookup, and a single-server review fetch. search_servers lists/summarizes while get_server_review drills into one server's details, so boundaries are unambiguous.
All three names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (search_servers, get_guide, get_server_review) with no mixed conventions. Predictable and readable.
Three tools is on the lean side, but for a read-only review/lookup service the surface is well-scoped and each tool earns its place. Slightly under what a richer browsing experience might want.
Search, guides, and detailed per-server reviews cover the core read-only lifecycle of a review directory, with section-level access for long reviews. Minor gaps like category listing or cross-server comparison are largely absorbed by the search tool.