Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
VERDICT_PROJECTNoThe project root directory for the verdict MCP server. Used to select tests and locate configuration..

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}
logging
{}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": false
}
resources
{
  "subscribe": false,
  "listChanged": false
}
extensions
{
  "io.modelcontextprotocol/ui": {}
}
experimental
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
verifyA

Verify the current working-tree changes by running affected pytest tests in a sandbox.

explain_failureA

Full traceback and output for one failing check from a previous verify run.

historyA

When was this failure fingerprint first/last seen, and how many times?

Use this to distinguish a regression you introduced (unknown fingerprint) from long-standing breakage (fingerprint seen across many runs/commits).

run_checksB

Run lint/type checks ('ruff', 'mypy') in the sandbox; same verdict shape as verify.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Scored across 4 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: verify runs unit tests, run_checks runs static checks, explain_failure provides failure details, and history shows recurrence patterns. No overlap or ambiguity exists between tools.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most tools follow a verb-first convention (verify, explain_failure, run_checks), but 'history' is a noun used as a query command. The style is otherwise consistent with snake_case and lowercase, making it readable, but the mix prevents a perfect score.

Tool Count5/5

With only 4 tools, the server is tightly scoped to verification and failure analysis. Each tool earns its place, covering the necessary actions without bloat or redundancy.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface fully covers the core workflow: running tests/lint checks, explaining failures, and checking historical recurrence. There are no obvious missing operations for this domain, and the lifecycle is complete for its stated purpose.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessResponsive