Skip to main content
Glama
Devatva24

LLM Router MCP

by Devatva24
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to LLM Router MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • ypollak2/llm-router

      ypollak2
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Routes your AI tasks to the best available model across 20+ providers — automatically selecting based on task type, budget, and subscription pressure. Supports text, image, video, and audio with built-in cost optimization and fallback chains.
      60
      734 PyPI
      90
      MIT

    • FreeModel MCP

      yummy342
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Routes tasks to the optimal AI model based on task type and benchmark scores across 25+ platforms. Automatically selects the best model for coding, reasoning, writing, and more using public benchmark data.
      5
      26 npm
      1
      MIT
    • DeepMyst MCP Server by DeepMyst

      DeepMyst MCP Serverofficial

      DeepMyst
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables intelligent LLM optimization and routing for Claude Desktop and HTTP clients, reducing token usage and automatically selecting the best model for each query.
      4
      MIT

    • tierline

      jayj221
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLM clients and coding agents to analyze prompts and recommend the cheapest AI model that meets the task requirements across text, voice, video, and other modalities, projecting monthly cost savings against a flagship baseline.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    route_prompt overlaps heavily with plan_workflow, generate_code, and implement_feature, as those three are just specialized routing tools with predetermined models. Additionally, generate_code and implement_feature are similar enough (complex vs repetitive coding) that an agent may struggle to choose between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (route_prompt, plan_workflow, clear_context, generate_code, implement_feature). The naming is predictable and clearly indicates the action and target.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for a specialized LLM routing purpose. Each tool has a distinct name and fits within the expected 3-15 range, making the tool surface easy to grasp.

    Completeness4/5

    The core workflow of routing, planning, generating, and implementing is covered, along with a context reset. Minor gaps exist, such as no tool to list available models or customize routing rules, but agents can work around these by using route_prompt for general tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources