zerodom_list_tabs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, so the description carries the full burden. It clearly communicates that the tool is read-only ('List') and discloses the special behavior of marking the active tab with `*`. It does not explicitly state that no tab state is modified, but 'list' strongly implies a non-destructive operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, compact sentence that front-loads the primary action and includes only the essential behavioral detail. Every word contributes to understanding, with no filler or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter, simple read-only list tool with an output schema available, the description is complete. It states what is listed and how the active tab is indicated; the output schema covers return value details, so no further description is necessary.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters and full schema coverage, so no parameter-level description is needed. The baseline for zero-parameter tools is 4, and the description adds no unnecessary parameter information.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('List') and resource ('every open tab'), and adds a distinguishing behavioral detail: marking the active tab with `*`. This makes it easily distinguishable from sibling tools like switch_tab, close_tab, and new_tab without needing to inspect schemas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use when the agent needs a complete view of open tabs, but it does not explicitly state when to prefer this over alternatives or mention that it is a prerequisite for switching/closing tabs. The use case is clear enough from context, but explicit guidance is absent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.