Skip to main content
Glama
DevDizzle

GammaRips Options Intelligence

by DevDizzle
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to GammaRips Options Intelligence

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Financial Tools

      huntbuilds
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides actionable financial intelligence tools for AI agents including insider buying signals, earnings IV plays, market pulse, stock analysis, and options strategies via free public data sources.
      6
      MIT

    • fathom-fyi

      0xHashy
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Financial intelligence for AI agents. 31 tools across 8 data sources — regime, derivatives, stablecoin flows, momentum, volatility, macro, DeFi, weather patterns, political cycles, seasonality. The context layer between your agent and a bad trade.
      31
      9 npm
      9
      MIT
    • Veynor MCP Server by veynor-xyz

      Veynor MCP Serverofficial

      veynor-xyz
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Prediction market intelligence for AI agents, enabling real-time access to whale trades, market data, signals, and AI-synthesized analysis from Kalshi and Polymarket via a standardized protocol.
      -

    • ko.io

      SharpLu
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Wall Street data feed for AI agents, providing access to 100M+ source-traced SEC records, institutional holdings, insider trades, congress trading, and more via MCP tools.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct job: pool discovery, single-name depth, daily reports, fresh liquidity, outcome research, raw replay, regime context, calendar status, and methodology reference. Even where tools share data (e.g., get_pool and get_signal), the batch-vs-single and surface-vs-deep-dive split is explicit and unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The get_ prefix dominates and clearly signals retrieval-style tools, with only query_outcomes and replay_contract breaking the pattern. The names are still predictable and readable, though a fully uniform verb_noun convention would have been cleaner.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well within the ideal scope for a domain-specific intelligence server. Each tool is broad enough to justify its existence, and none feel redundant or padded.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full research workflow: candidate pool, per-name deep dive, liquidity, realized outcomes, raw price replay, regime context, calendar availability, and methodology reference. Minor gaps exist—such as no direct options-chain browser or general contract metadata lookup—but the exposed views and replay/liquidity tools provide sufficient workarounds.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources