Skip to main content
Glama
Dev10x-Guru

ksef-mcp

by Dev10x-Guru
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to ksef-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-ksef-pl

      cmendezs
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Polish Electronic Invoicing (KSeF / FA(2)). Provides tools to validate, generate, and explore API specifications for KSeF interoperability.
      10
      95 PyPI
      3
      Apache 2.0

    • Local RAG MCP Server

      CortexLLMs
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables tool-calling over TCP for a local RAG pipeline, allowing document ingestion and querying via MCP tools, fully offline with no cloud dependencies.
      -

    • @m8t-jacob/mcp-polish-biz

      M8T-Jacob
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides AI agents with Polish business data tools: identifier validation (NIP, PESEL, REGON, KRS, IBAN), VAT whitelist checks, EU VIES lookups, and NBP exchange rates.
      5
      11 npm
      MIT

    • mcp-facturacion-electronica-es

      cmendezs
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Spanish Electronic Invoicing. Provides tools to generate, validate, and submit invoices across VERI\*FACTU, Facturae/FACe, SII, TicketBAI, and Crea y Crece B2B.
      20
      62 PyPI
      2
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation—sync, list, review, export CSV, render PDF, and server info—and the descriptions are unusually explicit about boundaries. The only potential confusion is between the two metadata-listing tools (list_recent_invoices and review_new_invoices), whose similar output shapes are nevertheless sharply distinguished as a fixed 30-day window versus a since-last-seen ledger.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Five of the six tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_object pattern: export_period_statement, render_invoice_pdf, list_recent_invoices, review_new_invoices, synchronise_invoices. server_info breaks the pattern as a bare noun phrase rather than a verb-led command, which is a minor but real deviation.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a domain-specific connector: one ingestion tool, two exposure/list tools, two output tools, and one informational tool. Each earns its place with no redundancy or filler.

    Completeness4/5

    The core workflow is fully traversable: synchronise brings invoices into the archive, list/review surface what arrived, and export/render produce the accountant-facing deliverables. The main gaps are the absence of a metadata lookup by a specific KSeF number and no way to list or search invoices older than the 30-day window, which agents would need to work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources