Skip to main content
Glama
Desmond-Labs

Supabase Storage MCP

by Desmond-Labs
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Supabase Storage MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • S3 MCP Server

      AM1010101
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with S3-compatible storage services like AWS S3 and Cloudflare R2, supporting bucket management, object listing, reading, uploading, and deletion operations.
      5
      240 npm
      ISC

    • Backblaze B2 MCP Server

      BraveRam
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables seamless integration with Backblaze B2 cloud storage for managing buckets, uploading/downloading files, handling large multipart uploads, and managing application keys through natural language interactions.
      18 npm
      1
      MIT

    • mcp-supabase

      GabsPereiraDev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Supabase databases, including listing tables, querying, inserting, updating, deleting records, and executing RPC functions.
      31 npm
      MIT

    • Supabase MCP Lite

      pinion05
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables minimal interaction with Supabase databases through 4 essential tools for data querying, mutations, file storage, and user authentication. Designed for 70% less context usage than standard implementations with auto-truncated results and simplified parameters.
      2
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    There is significant overlap between download-related tools (batch_download, download_file, download_file_with_auto_trigger, get_file_url, create_signed_urls) that could cause confusion about which to use for different download scenarios. However, the descriptions help clarify some distinctions like batch operations versus single file downloads. The upload and bucket management tools are more clearly differentiated.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (create_bucket, download_file, list_files, upload_image_batch) with clear action-oriented names. The main deviation is 'get_file_url' and 'get_security_status' which use 'get' instead of more specific verbs like 'generate' or 'retrieve', but overall the naming is quite readable and predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 10 tools, this is a reasonable number for a storage management server. The count feels slightly high due to the multiple overlapping download tools, but it covers core storage operations (upload, download, bucket management, security) without being overwhelming. A more consolidated download interface could reduce the count to be more optimal.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset provides good coverage of storage operations including CRUD-like functionality (upload, download, list), bucket management (create, setup), and security features. Minor gaps include missing file deletion, bucket deletion, and file metadata updates, but agents can accomplish most storage workflows with the available tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources