Skip to main content
Glama
Desearch-ai

Desearch MCP Server

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to Desearch MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables real-time search of X (Twitter) posts, user timelines, and trends using either xAI's Responses API or the official X API v2.
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables searching X (Twitter) posts, discussions, trends, and web content via Grok API using natural language.
      3
      2 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables searching X (formerly Twitter) using xAI's Responses API with support for filtering by handles, date ranges, and media understanding, returning structured results with citations.
      1
      2 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables searching X (Twitter) using the xAI Grok API to get summarised answers with citations. Supports filtering by handles, date range, and image/video understanding.
      1
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables real-time search of X.com (Twitter) posts, users, threads, and trends via xAI's Grok API, directly from Claude.
      5
      56 PyPI
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    The set contains many overlapping search and fetch tools: search, web-search, web-links-search, ai-search, x-search, x-links-search, fetch, extract, and web-crawl. Descriptions distinguish some cases, but an agent can easily choose the wrong web-search or page-reading tool.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use kebab-case, which is good, but the patterns are mixed: x-post-by-id, x-posts-by-urls, x-user-posts, web-search, and bare search/fetch/extract do not follow one consistent prefix or verb_noun convention. Readable but not predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    22 tools is heavy for this scope, largely because multiple search and extraction variants duplicate coverage. The People Search job lifecycle tools are justified, but the overall count feels over-expanded.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is broad across web search, X/Twitter posts, extraction, and the People Search lifecycle including status, control, tasks, and profiles. Minor gaps remain, such as no direct X user-profile lookup, but core workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive