Skip to main content
Glama

cwp_account_create

Create a CentOS Web Panel (CWP) hosting account with domain, username, password, email, and package to provision users.

Instructions

Create a new CWP account with domain, username, and package

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
emailYesEmail address for the account
inodeNoInode limit (optional)
backupNoEnable backup (default: true)
domainYesPrimary domain for the account
autosslNoEnable AutoSSL (default: false)
packageYesHosting package name
passwordYesPassword for the account (minimum 8 characters)
usernameYesUsername for the account
server_ipsNoServer IPs (optional)
limit_nprocNoProcess limit (optional)
limit_nofileNoFile limit (optional)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.1

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full behavioral burden. It does not disclose required permissions, whether the operation is destructive or reversible, what happens to existing data, or any rate limits. 'Create' implies a write, but no further behavioral traits are given.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, front-loaded sentence that is efficient and wastes no words. It could be slightly more informative, but conciseness is good.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a write tool with 11 parameters, 5 required, and no annotations or output schema, the description is too thin. It omits behavioral context such as permissions, side effects, and error handling that an agent would need.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all 11 parameters with descriptions and defaults. The description adds no parameter meaning beyond what the schema provides; baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Create') and resource ('CWP account'), and names the three key inputs. It is distinguishable from siblings like cwp_account_update or cwp_account_delete, though it doesn't explicitly contrast with them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as cwp_account_update, and no preconditions or context about required privileges. The description provides no routing information.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.