zadig_service_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are supplied, so the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. 'Get' reasonably implies a read-only operation, but the description doesn't add context about what the returned detail includes, how the production flag influences behavior, or any prerequisites. It is not contradictory, just thin.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. It is efficient and easy to parse, though its economy is partly a result of under-specification rather than careful selection of essential guidance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema may document the return shape, but the description still lacks parameter semantics and usage context. Given the large sibling set with several service-related tools, the sparse description is not enough for an agent to confidently distinguish this call from related ones.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning to service_name, project_key, or production. The agent gets no help understanding that project_key may scope the query or that production selects a deployment environment, so the description fails to compensate for the low schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Get') and a concrete object ('a Zadig K8s YAML service detail'), making it clear this is a singular read operation on a service resource. It does not explicitly contrast with zadig_service_search or environment_service_get, but the verb and resource are specific enough to be useful.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use guidance is provided. The description does not mention alternatives such as zadig_service_search or environment_service_get, nor does it state whether to prefer this tool for normal versus production services.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.