gemini-video-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to gemini-video-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to analyze YouTube videos by extracting summaries, timestamped outlines, diagrams with Mermaid code, and targeted insights about specific moments using Gemini's native video understanding.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceGives MCP clients access to YouTube video transcripts and metadata. It lets AI agents read and summarize video content from a URL.2 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceMCP (Model Context Protocol) server that utilizes the Google Gemini Vision API to interact with YouTube videos. It allows users to get descriptions, summaries, answers to questions, and extract key moments from YouTube videos.410 npm6MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables analysis of YouTube videos using the Gemini API to generate summaries and answer specific questions via direct URLs. It supports standard videos and shorts, allowing users to interact with video content without requiring manual downloads.510-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables YouTube content browsing, video searching, and metadata retrieval via the YouTube Data API v3. It also facilitates fetching video transcripts for summarization and analysis within MCP-compatible AI clients.735 npm1MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides YouTube video transcripts (text and metadata) as MCP tools for AI hosts like Claude Code, enabling summarization, search, and Q&A without watching the video.2-
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool in the server, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap. The tool's purpose is clearly defined and distinct from any other hypothetical tool.
The single tool uses a clear snake_case verb_noun pattern ('analyze_video'), which is internally consistent. There are no other tools to deviate from the pattern.
The server has a narrow, focused purpose (analyzing YouTube videos with Gemini), so one tool is slightly under the typical 3-15 range but still appropriate and not excessive. It covers the core functionality without unnecessary fragmentation.
For the stated domain of video analysis, the tool is complete: it handles both open-ended analysis and specific questions, works with public videos, and reports token usage. There are no obvious missing operations or dead ends.