DeltaX Preflight
OfficialServer Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| preflight_checkA | Check concrete candidate actions against owner-controlled policy and separately obtained evidence. Returns {result, handoff}: PASS_SINGLE means one proven option, SELECTION_REQUIRED means multiple, REFUSE means none, and EVIDENCE_REQUIRED means at least one remains unproven. Handoff is null except for SELECTION_REQUIRED. Invalid documents return a tool error with no partial report. When to use
When NOT to use
|
| preflight_hash_decisionA | Validate a Preflight v2 decision and return {decision_hash}, its canonical SHA-256 digest. Invalid decisions return a tool error, not a hash. When to use
When NOT to use
|
| preflight_hash_policyA | Validate a Preflight v2 policy and return {policy_hash}, its canonical SHA-256 digest. Invalid policies return a tool error, not a hash. When to use
When NOT to use
|
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The three tools target clearly distinct operations: evaluating candidate actions, hashing a decision, and hashing a policy. Although the two hash tools share the 'hash' verb, their inputs and purposes are unambiguous, and the descriptions explicitly separate them.
All tools use the same snake_case convention with a consistent 'preflight_' namespace prefix. The action suffixes are readable and predictable despite the slight grammatical difference between 'check' and 'hash_*'.
Three tools are well-scoped for a narrow preflight validation server. Each tool earns its place: one evaluation operation and two canonical hashing operations for the objects the server manages.
The surface covers the core lifecycle of checking candidates and pinning policies/decisions with canonical hashes. A minor gap is that there is no separate evidence/proposal hashing or inspection tool, but the stated workflow does not strictly require one.