A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceMCP server that integrates Trello with AI agents, enabling natural language management of boards, lists, cards, checklists, attachments, and custom fields.
267 npm
2
MIT
Trello MCP Server - Optimized
Related Servers
Alternatives to Trello MCP Server - Optimized
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA powerful MCP server for interacting with Trello boards, lists, and cards via AI Hosts.2254-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceThis is an MCP Server for Trello that enables interaction with Trello's API through natural language, allowing management of boards, cards, lists, and other Trello resources.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Trello that enables comprehensive management of boards, cards, lists, labels, checklists, attachments, members, custom fields, and search through natural language.154 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that provides read and write access to Trello boards, enabling AI assistants to list, search, create, update, move, comment, label, and archive cards via natural language.15MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Trello integration, enabling management of workspaces, boards, lists, cards, and checklists through natural language.MIT
TDQS
C2.8/5.0
Scored across 76 tools
Disambiguation2/5
Most tools clearly target a specific resource, but several near-duplicate pairs create confusion: add_label vs add_label_to_card, remove_label vs remove_label_from_card, and update_checkitem vs update_checkitem_state_on_card. Generic update tools also overlap with field-specific variants like update_list vs update_list_name/update_list_position, making misselection likely.
Naming Consistency4/5
Names almost universally follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern, which is predictable and readable. Minor inconsistencies exist in granularity and phrasing, such as add_label vs add_label_to_card and generic update tools coexisting with field-specific ones, but the overall convention is consistent.
Tool Count1/5
76 tools far exceeds the well-scoped range and crosses the 50+ extreme threshold. Many tools could be consolidated, such as update_list_name/update_list_position into update_list and update_label_name/update_label_color into update_label, so the count feels inflated rather than purposeful.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers the main Trello lifecycle for boards, lists, cards, labels, checklists, members, attachments, and comments. Minor gaps remain, including no update/delete for comments, no organization mutation tools, and no explicit due-date removal, but these are workable for most workflows.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues