ghed-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to ghed-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that gives AI assistants direct access to the World Health Organization's Global Health Observatory (GHO) for comparative health systems research.15MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that brings your Withings health data into Claude, allowing natural conversation access to sleep patterns, body measurements, workouts, heart data, and more.42MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that connects Claude to your Google Sheets for personal finance tracking, analysis, and reporting — all through natural language.2-
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA powerful SQLite-backed expense tracking server built with the Model Context Protocol (MCP). This server allows AI agents (like Claude) to manage your personal finances by adding, deleting, and listing expenses directly from your chat interface.3-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA Claude-compatible MCP server that exposes health-domain tools over 100% synthetic data, built with security and compliance in mind.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that gives Claude access to your WHOOP biometric data — recovery, sleep, strain, and workouts.33 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 35 tools
Multiple tools have heavily overlapping boundaries: compare_countries, compare_country_group, summarize_country_group, and get_indicator_data all retrieve one indicator across country sets, and compare_countries also accepts country_group, making the distinction unclear. Search and list tools similarly overlap across indicators vs. variables, and data quality/metadata tools are hard to separate without deep inspection.
The set mostly uses verb_noun names like list_variables, get_indicator_data, and build_research_panel, but a substantial minority are noun-only commands such as country_profile, version, methodology_guide, topics_index, indicator_trend, and cache_status. The conventions are mixed but still readable and not chaotic.
At 35 tools, the server is well beyond the 25+ threshold and feels over-granular for its domain. Several tools could be consolidated, especially the country-comparison trio and the search/list variants, without losing real capability.
The tool surface is unusually complete for the GHED domain: it covers discovery, metadata, data availability, country and group resolution, single-indicator retrieval, cross-country comparison, trend analysis, research panel construction, export packaging, and cache/version management. There are no obvious dead ends or missing operations for a read-only database server.