list_account_admin_users

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description carries full disclosure burden. It reveals the HTTP verb and parameter placement, implying a read-only list call, but does not describe pagination defaults, response shape, rate limits, authorization requirements, or anything about the optional body parameter. The burden is not met.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences carry the purpose, the endpoint, and the parameter placement rules. Front-loaded and free of filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Output schema exists, so return format is covered. Endpoint and param-placement conventions give a workable baseline, but the description leaves the body parameter unexplained and does not disambiguate the heavily overlapping sibling list_admin_users. Adequate but with clear gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% (all three parameters are generic additionalProperties objects), so the schema provides no meaning. The description adds partial compensation by mapping path_params to route IDs and query to filtering/pagination/sorting/include values, but it never lists which route IDs or which filter/sort keys are supported.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: 'List account administrators' plus the exact endpoint GET /accounts/{accountId}/users. However, it does not differentiate itself from the sibling list_admin_users, so an agent must guess which tool covers account-scoped admins versus a global list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides placement guidance (route IDs in path_params; filtering, pagination, sorting, include values in query), which helps invocation. But it gives no when-to-use or when-not-to-use context relative to alternatives such as list_admin_users, and no mention of required accountId.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.