deploy_rpg

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It states the tool deploys a persistent mini-RPG, implying a write operation with ongoing effects, but doesn't disclose behavioral traits like permissions needed, whether it's idempotent, rate limits, or what 'persistent' entails (e.g., data storage, runtime). This leaves significant gaps for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence in French that directly states the tool's purpose without unnecessary words. It's appropriately sized and front-loaded, with every part contributing essential information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool likely involves mutation (deploying a game) with no annotations and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain what 'deploie' entails operationally, what the RPG does, how persistence works, or what happens on invocation. For a zero-param tool, it's minimal but lacks needed context for safe use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0 parameters and 100% schema description coverage, the baseline is 4. The description adds context by specifying deployment to a channel, but since there are no parameters to document, it doesn't need to compensate for schema gaps.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('déploie' meaning 'deploys') and the resource ('mini-RPG persistant'), specifying it deploys to a specified channel. It distinguishes from siblings like create_channel or create_interactive_quiz by focusing on RPG deployment, but doesn't explicitly differentiate from other game-related tools (none are listed).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description mentions deploying to a 'canal spécifié' (specified channel), but doesn't clarify prerequisites, when-not-to-use scenarios, or how it relates to siblings like create_interactive_quiz or show_game_result.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.