A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceMCP server that enables Claude Code to communicate with other Claude Code agents over HTTP, allowing users to ask questions about remote codebases or delegate coding tasks.
MIT
Claude-Code MCP Runner
by DeamonDev888
Related Servers
Alternatives to Claude-Code MCP Runner
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that spawns autonomous Claude Code agents in GitHub repos, enabling task delegation with persistent state, multi-step workflows, and job monitoring.47187 npm2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLocal MCP server for Claude Code providing persistent memory, task planning, and agent coordination with full transparency and no network calls.2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceMCP server for running external coding agents as background tasks inside Claude Code. Supports multiple backends including Codex, Grok, GLM, DeepSeek, and more.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that allows Claude Desktop to remotely control Claude Code instances for executing commands and managing files.14 npmGPL 3.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that bridges Claude Desktop and Claude Code by letting Desktop read and interact with Claude Code Remote Control sessions, enabling cross-agent coordination.63MIT
TDQS
A3.7/5.0
Scored across 7 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct operation: agent creation vs prompt creation, agent deletion, prompt editing, listing agents, running agents, and config updating. The descriptions clearly differentiate them, so no ambiguity.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_agent, edit_prompt, run_agent), making them predictable and easy to understand.
Tool Count5/5
With 7 tools, the server covers the essential operations for managing and running agents without being overly narrow or bloated. The number fits the scope well.
Completeness4/5
The tool set covers create, read, update, delete for agents and prompts, plus execution. A minor gap is the lack of a dedicated get_agent tool (though list_agents with details=true partly covers it), but overall the surface is solid.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues