Skip to main content
Glama
DeFadeLtd

DeFade

Official
by DeFadeLtd
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to DeFade

  • Mindjack

    freyotrisolana
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Solana memecoin rug check and token risk for trading agents in the trenches: pump.fun launches, calibrated rug probability with a published hit rate, sniper, insider and bundle detection, holder clusters, KOL trades, wallet history and a live sellability check for memecoins. Available as a remote MCP endpoint (OAuth or API key) and as an npm stdio package.
    26
    48 npm
    3
    MIT

Related Servers

  • memecoin-spotter

    sjohnewa
    F
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables read-only on-chain analysis to spot trending and new memecoin pools, evaluate rug risk, and surface early buyer wallets across Solana, Base, and Ethereum.
    5
    -

  • Cabal-Hunter

    paulf280-ui
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    On-chain Solana token safety for trading agents — traces coordinated wallet funding, same-block Jito bundles, serial-rug deployers and live coordinated dumps into one Exit-Liquidity Risk verdict before a swap. Free tier, then $0.02 USDC/query via x402.
    1
    184 npm
    1
    MIT
  • SolSentry MCP by solsentry

    SolSentry MCPofficial

    solsentry
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Provides post-deploy Solana threat intelligence, enabling AI agents to check operators, tokens, and network stats for detecting rug pulls and malicious activity.
    5
    17 npm
    MIT

  • VerdictSwarm MCP Server

    sentien-labs
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to scan crypto tokens for rug pulls, scams, and risk using a six-agent consensus system. It provides real-time security audits and risk scoring for tokens on Solana, Ethereum, Base, and BSC.
    6
    45 PyPI
    2
    MIT
Deploy Server
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

A4.8/5.0

Scored across 15 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Every tool targets a distinct forensic dimension—overall scan, rug probability, dev behavior, holder distribution, whale activity, liquidity, launch coordination, wallet links, smart money, funding provenance, behavioral clusters, fee fingerprints, price, and quota. The four 'who is behind this token' tools are explicitly differentiated by evidence type (proven transfers vs funding origin vs behavioral inference vs config fingerprint). get_rug_score and get_token_scan are explicitly inverse direction.

Naming Consistency5/5

All 15 tools follow the exact get_<noun_phrase> pattern in snake_case, with no exceptions. The verbs are consistent (get), and each noun clearly identifies the resource or metric. This is a textbook example of predictable naming.

Tool Count5/5

15 tools is on the higher end but each earns its place in a comprehensive token risk analysis suite. The count is justified by the domain's complexity—forensic risk assessment requires specialized probes for launch, holders, liquidity, wallet graphs, and behavioral patterns. No tool is redundant or trivial.

Completeness5/5

The surface covers the full lifecycle of token risk analysis: initial scan, rug probability, dev history, holder concentration, whale activity, liquidity locks, launch integrity, insider links, smart money, funding provenance, behavioral clustering, config fingerprinting, price history, and API quota. There are no obvious dead ends—every 'who is behind this' angle has a dedicated tool, and cross-references guide the agent to complementary tools.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources