Codebase MCP
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| getCodebaseC | Retrieve the entire codebase as a single text output using RepoMix |
| getRemoteCodebaseC | Retrieve a remote repository's codebase as a single text output using RepoMix |
| saveCodebaseC | Save the codebase to a file using RepoMix |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The three tools have distinct purposes: retrieving local codebase, retrieving remote codebase, and saving codebase. While 'getCodebase' and 'getRemoteCodebase' both retrieve code, the local/remote distinction is clear. There's minor potential confusion about whether 'saveCodebase' saves the local or remote version, but overall boundaries are well-defined.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with camelCase styling: getCodebase, getRemoteCodebase, saveCodebase. The naming is predictable and follows the same grammatical structure throughout, making it easy for agents to understand the action-object relationship.
With only 3 tools, this feels quite minimal for a 'Codebase MCP' server. While the tools cover basic retrieval and saving operations, the scope seems limited - there are no tools for searching, analyzing, modifying, or managing codebase components. The count is borderline thin for what could be expected from a codebase management system.
For a codebase management server, there are significant gaps in functionality. The tools only provide retrieval and saving operations using RepoMix, but lack any tools for code analysis, search, modification, version control operations, or component management. This creates a dead-end surface where agents can only get and save entire codebases without any ability to work with code meaningfully.