Scrooge
by De-Cri
README.md

# Scrooge
**Pre-edit situational awareness for AI coding agents.**
Before an agent touches a file, Scrooge tells it the full scope of the change: what the file structurally calls, and — crucially — which other files have historically been edited *together with it* in the same commits, even without a direct code relationship.
This prevents the most common agent failure mode: **incomplete edits** — fixing the right file but missing the coupled module that also needed to change.
Available as a **CLI tool** and **MCP server** (plug directly into Claude Code and other agents).
---
## The Problem
~35% of AI agent coding failures are **incomplete edits** (SWE-bench, 2024): the agent fixed the right location but missed a coupled module. Call-graph tools like Aider's repo map can't catch this — they only see structural connections (A calls B), not behavioral ones (A and B are always edited together).
## How Scrooge Addresses It
Scrooge combines two signals:
**1. Structural call graph** — which functions call which, ranked by graph distance + PageRank. Finds the files directly involved in a query.
**2. Co-change graph** — mined from `git log`. Finds files that have historically been modified *in the same commits*, even with no direct code relationship. These are the implicit dependencies: shared invariants, parallel implementations, configuration that moves with logic.
Given a query or a file the agent is about to edit, Scrooge returns:
- Candidate files to read (structural)
- Co-change alerts: files that will *almost certainly* also need editing (behavioral)
---
## Benchmark Results
### Co-change: incomplete edit prevention
Tested on real git history from two Python libraries (50+ test cases total). **Ground truth:** commits that changed multiple source files simultaneously. **Task:** given one file, does the tool surface the others that were also edited?
| Tool | Recall@1 | Recall@3 | Recall@5 | MRR |
|------|----------|----------|----------|-----|
| Structural only (Aider-style) | 0.135 | 0.172 | 0.183 | 0.271 |
| Co-change only | 0.220 | 0.394 | 0.548 | 0.447 |
| **Scrooge combined** | **0.278** | **0.449** | **0.557** | **0.528** |
**Scrooge combined vs. Aider-style structural: +204% Recall@5, +95% MRR.**
In 56% of real multi-file edits, Scrooge correctly surfaces all required co-changed files in the top 5. Structural-only navigation achieves 18%.
### File navigation: finding the right module
Tested on 16 ground-truth queries across three Python repos (small/medium/large).
| Metric | Result |
|--------|--------|
| Recall (correct file returned at all) | **100%** |
| Hit@1 (correct file ranked #1) | **75%** |
| Hit@3 (correct file in top 3) | **94%** |
| File reduction vs. keyword grep | **10.5×** |
Full methodology: [`benchmarks/BENCHMARK_REPORT.md`](benchmarks/BENCHMARK_REPORT.md) and [`benchmarks/COCHANGE_REPORT.md`](benchmarks/COCHANGE_REPORT.md)
---
## How It Works
```
repo
└── Scanner → find all .py files
└── Parser → extract functions, classes, calls (Python AST)
└── Graph Builder → directed call graph (NetworkX)
└── Ranker → score nodes by query relevance
│ (graph distance + normalized PageRank + token coverage)
└── CLI / MCP → return 2–3 ranked files with call context
```
### Query flow
Scrooge matches queries by **substring against code identifiers** — function names, class names, method names, file names. For best results, pass symbol-oriented keywords, not natural language:
```
User: "how does the authentication flow work?"
↓
Agent extracts keywords (built into MCP description)
↓
Scrooge query: "auth login authenticate"
↓
Matches: auth.py → authenticate(), login_user()
↓
Returns: auth.py (relevance 100) + utils.py (relevance 72)
with calls/called_by for each
```
This keyword extraction step is baked into the MCP tool descriptions, so agents using Claude Code do it automatically.
### Output example
```json
{
"candidates": [
{
"file": "/path/to/auth.py",
"relevance": 100,
"matches": [{"symbol": "login_user", "line": 42}, {"symbol": "authenticate", "line": 61}],
"calls": ["utils.normalize_username", "db.get_user"],
"called_by": ["api.login_endpoint"]
}
]
}
```
The agent reads `auth.py` starting at line 42. It knows before opening the file that it calls `utils` and `db`, and that the API layer calls into it.
---
## Installation
**Prerequisites:** Python 3.11+, uv (recommended) or pip
```bash
git clone https://github.com/De-Cri/Scrooge.git
cd Scrooge
uv pip install -e .
```
Both `scrooge` (CLI) and `scrooge-mcp` (MCP server) are installed.
---
## Setup as MCP Server (Claude Code)
Open your Claude Code settings file:
| OS | Path |
|---|---|
| macOS / Linux | `~/.claude/settings.json` |
| Windows | `%USERPROFILE%\.claude\settings.json` |
Add the `Scrooge` block inside `mcpServers`:
**With uv (recommended):**
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"Scrooge": {
"command": "uv",
"args": ["run", "--directory", "/absolute/path/to/Scrooge", "scrooge-mcp"]
}
}
}
```
**With venv (Windows):**
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"Scrooge": {
"command": "C:/path/to/Scrooge/.venv/Scripts/python.exe",
"args": ["-m", "mcp_server.scrooge_mcp"],
"cwd": "C:/path/to/Scrooge"
}
}
}
```
Restart Claude Code. The `architecture`, `connections`, and `index` tools appear automatically. Claude will use them when exploring codebases — you don't need to prompt it differently.
---
## CLI Usage
### `architecture` — find files relevant to a query
```bash
scrooge architecture path/to/repo auth login
```
```json
{
"candidates": [
{
"file": "auth.py",
"relevance": 100,
"matches": [{"symbol": "login_user", "line": 42}],
"calls": ["utils.normalize_username"],
"called_by": ["api.login_endpoint"]
}
]
}
```
Options:
- `--rank-keep-pct` (default 0.3) — fraction of top-ranked graph nodes to keep
- `--file-keep-pct` (default 0.35) — fraction of top-ranked files to keep
### `connections` — trace call paths around matched symbols
```bash
scrooge connections path/to/repo auth login 2
scrooge connections path/to/repo auth login 2 --compact
```
---
## MCP Tools
| Tool | What it does |
|------|-------------|
| `architecture` | Returns ranked candidate files with matches, calls, called_by. Saves result to `.scrooge_architecture.json` in the repo root — agents can re-read it without calling the tool again. |
| `connections` | Returns the raw call graph around matched symbols (BFS, configurable depth). |
| `index` | Returns the full parsed structure + graph for the repo. |
---
## Project Structure
```
Scrooge/
├── scanner/scanner.py # find source files
├── parser/ast_parser.py # Python AST → functions, classes, calls
├── indexer/symbol_extractor.py # match query tokens to symbol names + token coverage scoring
├── graph_builder/
│ ├── call_graph.py # build NetworkX directed call graph
│ └── symbols_connections.py # BFS traversal + connection output
├── intelligence/rank_graph_connections.py # node ranking (normalized PageRank + distance)
├── cli/scrooge_cli.py # CLI entry point
├── mcp_server/scrooge_mcp.py # MCP server entry point
└── benchmarks/
├── objective_benchmark.py # reproducible benchmark harness
└── BENCHMARK_REPORT.md # full results and analysis
```
---
## Current Limitations
- **Python only** — AST parsing is implemented for Python. JS/TS file discovery exists but parsing is not implemented yet.
- **No caching** — every query re-parses the repo. Fast enough today (0.3–0.8s), but would need a cache for very large repos or high query frequency.
- **Keyword queries only** — Scrooge matches identifiers, not semantics. For vague conceptual questions, a semantic embedding search is complementary.
- **Call resolution is best-effort** — dynamic dispatch, decorators, and `functools.partial` are invisible to static AST analysis.
---
## License
MIT
This server cannot be deployed
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues