export_csv
Export RGAA audit results to CSV format. Use the audit's unique ID to download structured data.
Instructions
Export audit results in CSV format.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uniqueId | Yes | The editUniqueId of the audit |
Export RGAA audit results to CSV format. Use the audit's unique ID to download structured data.
Export audit results in CSV format.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uniqueId | Yes | The editUniqueId of the audit |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description does not disclose whether export is synchronous, returns data directly, or triggers a download. Lacks details on file size limits or response format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no redundancy; however, it could be slightly expanded to include output format without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Minimal description for a simple tool; lacks indication of output form (e.g., file download, URL) or error cases. No output schema to compensate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% for the single parameter 'uniqueId', with description already provided in schema. Tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Specifies verb 'Export' and resource 'audit results in CSV format', clearly distinguishing from sibling tools like get_audit or get_report.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_audit_results or get_report. No prerequisites or exclusions mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/DavidPivert/ara-rgaa-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server