Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to browser-devtools-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to control and inspect a live Chrome browser for automation, debugging, performance analysis, network monitoring, and DOM interaction through Chrome DevTools Protocol.
      3,058,477 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to control and inspect a live Chrome browser for automated debugging, performance analysis, and web interaction. It leverages Puppeteer and Chrome DevTools to provide capabilities like network monitoring, console logging, and automated browser actions.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Lets AI coding assistants control and inspect a live Chrome browser using full Chrome DevTools capabilities for browser automation, debugging, and performance analysis.
      3,058,477 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and developers to automate real Chrome/Chromium browsers through the Chrome DevTools Protocol, with token-efficient snapshots, multi-action batching, shadow DOM traversal, system-page control, extension management, and network/WebSocket inspection.
      64
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 36 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools map to a distinct resource+action, but three families (capture_*, events_*, recording_*) all concern capturing telemetry yet differ only by buffering/persistence strategy, which an agent could confuse. resources_list vs network_list and page_dom vs resources_get are documented as complementary and distinguishable. Overall boundaries are mostly clear with a few overlapping regions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names consistently use snake_case with a domain prefix (browser_, page_, console_, network_, events_, capture_, recording_, resources_, target_, session_). A few tools drop the verb (capture_status, capture_save, session_info, session_dump), which is a minor deviation from the verb_noun ideal. Still highly predictable overall.

    Tool Count3/5

    36 tools is heavy for a single server and crosses into the 'too many' band. The breadth across launch/discovery/session/capture/events/recording/console/network/DOM/resources/storage/performance is genuine, but the capture/events/recording redundancy inflates the count beyond what the domain strictly needs.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is strong: process discovery, launch/attach/close, target selection, console, network, DOM, resources, storage, performance, screenshots, buffered capture, real-time events, and persistent recording. Minor gaps exist (no navigation/reload control, no input/interaction or request interception), but core diagnostic workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues