browser-devtools-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to browser-devtools-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding assistants to control and inspect a live Chrome browser through Chrome DevTools. Provides browser automation, performance analysis, debugging capabilities, and network request monitoring.3,058,477 npm52,668Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI coding assistants to control and inspect a live Chrome browser for automation, debugging, performance analysis, network monitoring, and DOM interaction through Chrome DevTools Protocol.3,058,477 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI coding assistants to control and inspect a live Chrome browser for automation, debugging, performance analysis, and screenshot capture through Chrome DevTools.263,058,477 npm3Apache 2.0
- -licenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI coding assistants to control and inspect a live Chrome browser for automated debugging, performance analysis, and web interaction. It leverages Puppeteer and Chrome DevTools to provide capabilities like network monitoring, console logging, and automated browser actions.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceLets AI coding assistants control and inspect a live Chrome browser using full Chrome DevTools capabilities for browser automation, debugging, and performance analysis.3,058,477 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents and developers to automate real Chrome/Chromium browsers through the Chrome DevTools Protocol, with token-efficient snapshots, multi-action batching, shadow DOM traversal, system-page control, extension management, and network/WebSocket inspection.64MIT
TDQS
Scored across 36 tools
Most tools map to a distinct resource+action, but three families (capture_*, events_*, recording_*) all concern capturing telemetry yet differ only by buffering/persistence strategy, which an agent could confuse. resources_list vs network_list and page_dom vs resources_get are documented as complementary and distinguishable. Overall boundaries are mostly clear with a few overlapping regions.
Names consistently use snake_case with a domain prefix (browser_, page_, console_, network_, events_, capture_, recording_, resources_, target_, session_). A few tools drop the verb (capture_status, capture_save, session_info, session_dump), which is a minor deviation from the verb_noun ideal. Still highly predictable overall.
36 tools is heavy for a single server and crosses into the 'too many' band. The breadth across launch/discovery/session/capture/events/recording/console/network/DOM/resources/storage/performance is genuine, but the capture/events/recording redundancy inflates the count beyond what the domain strictly needs.
Coverage is strong: process discovery, launch/attach/close, target selection, console, network, DOM, resources, storage, performance, screenshots, buffered capture, real-time events, and persistent recording. Minor gaps exist (no navigation/reload control, no input/interaction or request interception), but core diagnostic workflows are covered.