Skip to main content
Glama
DaveEdge1

freecad-mcp

by DaveEdge1
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to freecad-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • FreeCAD MCP

      heok-yongssun
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables control of FreeCAD CAD software from Claude Desktop through natural language commands. Supports creating, editing, and managing 3D objects, executing Python code, and generating screenshots of designs.
      10
      MIT

    • FreeCAD MCP

      Yaeshio
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Desktop to control FreeCAD for 3D CAD modeling, including creating, editing, and deleting objects, executing Python code, and running FEM analyses.
      14
      MIT

    • FreeCAD MCP Connector

      mario-2015
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Connects Claude Desktop to a running FreeCAD instance, enabling document management, part creation and editing, direct Python execution, parts library insertion, FEM analysis, and 3D view screenshots.
      14
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes (create, edit, delete, list, get). The edit_object tool description mentions it is used when create_object cannot handle creation, which could cause slight confusion, but overall each tool's intent is clear.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case, such as create_object, list_documents, get_view. Pluralization for list/get operations is appropriate and consistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools covering document management, object CRUD, viewing, parts library, and code execution, the count is well-scoped for a CAD tool server, providing necessary functionality without bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    Core CRUD and document operations are covered. Missing are save/close document tools, but arbitrary code execution via execute_code can fill gaps. Overall, the tool surface is reasonably complete for typical CAD workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources