get_account_info
Retrieve your account balances and fee tiers to manage your positions and assets on WOOFi Pro.
Instructions
Fetch account balances and fee tiers
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve your account balances and fee tiers to manage your positions and assets on WOOFi Pro.
Fetch account balances and fee tiers
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Without annotations, the description should disclose behavioral traits such as side effects, authentication requirements, or rate limits. It only states the basic purpose, offering no additional transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence with no wasted words. It is front-loaded and minimal.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple fetch tool with no parameters and no output schema, the description is adequate but could be more complete by hinting at the response format or scope (e.g., all assets).
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, and the schema coverage is 100% (vacuously). The description does not need to add parameter semantics, so a baseline of 4 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Fetch' and the resource 'account balances and fee tiers', which is specific and distinct from sibling tools that focus on orders, positions, or other entities.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_holdings or get_all_positions. The description lacks context or exclusion criteria.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/DaunteEth/woofi-pro-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server