Datai MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Datai MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to fetch live multi-chain portfolio, token info, gas prices, and token prices across Ethereum, Base, Polygon, Arbitrum, and Optimism with a single call. No API key required.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to fetch crypto wallet holdings across chains, including ETH, ERC-20 tokens, and USD values, with pay-per-call access via x402 micropayments.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceConnects AI agents to Real World Asset (RWA) data, enabling queries about tokenized assets, market trends, TVL analytics, token holders, and portfolio tracking across multiple blockchains.181MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to access live blockchain data across multiple networks, including wallet holdings, payment verification, token prices, swaps, and scam checks.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor and other MCP clients to read a user's real crypto portfolio data — holdings, movement history, FIFO cost basis and P&L, fees, income, risk metrics and target-allocation drift — across connected exchanges and on-chain wallets via read-only OAuth access. An optional propose-only tool parks changes for human approval in the browser rather than writing anything directly.1MIT

Zerion Hosted MCPofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceZerion MCP let's your agent analyze EVM and Solana wallets and summarize total portfolio value, top holdings, DeFi positions, recent transactions, PnL and more.69-
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Multiple tools have unclear boundaries and overlapping purposes, causing potential confusion. For example, 'get_defi_balances_by_chain' and 'get_wallet_balances_by_chain' both retrieve balances on a specific chain, while 'get_defi_by_chain' and 'get_defi_multi_chains' overlap in multi-chain analysis. The descriptions help somewhat, but the distinctions are not clearly defined.
The naming follows a mostly consistent verb_noun pattern with 'get_' prefix throughout, making tools readable and predictable. However, there are minor deviations like 'get_all_defi_positions' (adjective before noun) and 'get_overall_balance_all_c' (abbreviated 'all_c'), which slightly break the pattern but do not severely impact usability.
With 8 tools, the count is reasonable for a DeFi portfolio analysis server, but it feels borderline due to the significant overlap and redundancy among tools. The server could benefit from consolidation, as some tools (e.g., 'get_defi_by_chain' and 'get_defi_multi_chains') serve similar purposes, making the set feel slightly heavy for its scope.
The tool surface covers the domain of DeFi and wallet portfolio analysis well, with tools for overall balances, DeFi positions, and chain/protocol-specific queries. Minor gaps exist, such as no tools for historical data or transaction analysis, but agents can work around these for core tasks like portfolio overview and risk assessment.