himalaya-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to himalaya-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA self-hosted, multi-mailbox MCP server that exposes IMAP/SMTP operations as tools for AI agents, enabling email management like listing folders, reading, searching, sending, and moving messages via natural language.MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA local-first Python MCP server that turns Gmail, Outlook/Microsoft 365, iCloud Mail, and generic IMAP/SMTP mailboxes into a synchronized, searchable OKF knowledge layer, exposing 38 tools and four resources for mailbox actions, synchronization, retrieval, attachments, and optional semantic search while keeping the provider mailbox authoritative.381MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceCross-platform MCP server and CLI for email operations, including send, read, search, and contact management, compatible with Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo, and any IMAP/SMTP providers.36 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvider-agnostic email MCP server that connects any IMAP mailbox to AI assistants, enabling email management through natural language.813 PyPIAGPL 3.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA local MCP server that provides LLM clients with read/write access to email and calendar data from Gmail, iCloud, and generic IMAP providers. It runs entirely on your machine, keeping data private while enabling email management, calendar operations, and task handling through natural language.39MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to read, search, send, schedule, manage, and analyze mail across multiple IMAP/SMTP accounts, with provider-aware labels, real-time IDLE watching, verification-code capture, and OAuth2 support. Connects over stdio or Streamable HTTP, exposing 52 tools, 7 prompts, and 6 resources with a guided setup wizard.28 npmISC
TDQS
Scored across 29 tools
Most tools are clearly differentiated by resource and action, such as list_emails vs search_emails vs list_threads. However, the four email-reading variants (read_email, read_email_html, render_email, read_email_raw) and the draft/send/compose tools have some overlap that could cause misselection. Descriptions provide enough guidance to resolve most ambiguity.
Nearly all tools follow a predictable verb_noun pattern: list_emails, read_email, create_folder, delete_folder, send_email, move_email, etc. Minor deviations like export_to_markdown and health_check do not significantly disrupt readability. The convention is consistent enough for an agent to infer behavior.
The server exposes 29 tools, which exceeds the reasonable range for a focused email MCP surface. While many tools are useful, the count includes overlapping read variants, specialized extras, and unrelated utilities like clipboard and Apple Calendar/Reminders. This feels heavy and increases the chance of tool-selection confusion.
The surface covers the core email lifecycle well: search, read, flag, move, compose, send, folders, threads, attachments, and diagnostics. Minor gaps exist, such as explicit forward support and editing existing drafts, but agents can work around these. Overall the tool set is fairly complete for the stated himalaya email domain.