Marketic
# Marketic — Your Marketing Brain
> The best marketing teams don't guess what the market wants. They measure it.
**Marketic watches the market 24/7. Every morning, you get a briefing with what actually matters — before your first coffee.**
Not a dashboard. Not another tab. A prioritised brief with real signals, budget advice, competitor moves, and campaign plans — generated from 9 sources, measured against outcomes, and logged with reasoning.
[](https://github.com/Das-rebel/marketic)
[](https://github.com/Das-rebel/marketic)
[](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
---
## The Monday Morning Problem
*(If you've ever opened 7 browser tabs at 8am wondering what actually happened — this is for you.)*
```text
YOUR MONDAY WITHOUT MARKETIC
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
7:45 Wake up. Coffee. Open laptop.
8:00 Open 7 browser tabs:
Google Trends "what's trending?"
Competitor ads "what launched?"
Mixpanel "why did last week drop?"
LinkedIn "what's everyone saying?"
Slack #mktg "did anyone reply?"
Email analyst "can you pull..."
HubSpot "which lead converted?"
9:30 Still don't know what matters.
10:00 Stand-up. Wing it.
YOUR MONDAY WITH MARKETIC
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
7:58 Notification: "Your briefing is ready"
8:00 Read 6 sentences:
① Kraken IPO buzz ($1.6M, 15% likely)
→ Ride fintech content today
② D2C skincare India rising (Google IN)
→ Publish before the spike peaks
③ Shark Tank India: 3x mentions this week
→ "As seen on Shark Tank" angle
⚠ IGNORED: Crypto drama ($4M, 6% likely)
→ Probability-adjusted — doesn't make the brief
📊 Budget: Email $9,200 · Social $5,800
→ Email margin 85% > Social 15%
🤖 Competitor X: new ad live since Tue
→ Counter-angle: clinical vs DIY
8:07 Coffee. Done.
8:08 Start the actual work.
```
*See: [docs/assets/monday_problem.txt](docs/assets/monday_problem.txt)*
---
## 3 Numbers That Tell the Story
| | Before | With Marketic |
|---|---|---|
| **Briefing time** | 175 min | **8 min** |
| **Decisions informed/day** | 2–3 (gut feel) | **4–5** (signal-backed) |
| **Time saved per week** | 0 | **3.2 hrs** |
*See: [docs/assets/comparison_table.txt](docs/assets/comparison_table.txt)*
---
## What You Actually Get
**1. The Signal Brief (8:00 AM)**
```
TOP SIGNALS
① Kraken IPO buzz — $1.6M bet · 15% probability · SCORE 72/100
→ Ride fintech narrative this week
② D2C skincare India — Rising Google searches in IN
→ Publish before spike peaks · 5-day window
③ Shark Tank India buzz — 3x mentions week-over-week
→ Angle: "as seen on Shark Tank" trust signal
⚠ IGNORED: Crypto crash talk ($4M volume, 6% odds)
→ Drama, not signal — probability-adjusted out
```
**2. The Campaign Brief (2:00 PM)**
```
BRAND: GlowSkincare IN
BUDGET: Email $9,200 · Paid Social $5,800
(margin-adjusted: email 85% margin > social 15%)
COPY VARIANTS:
A: "Your skin deserves clinical-grade care"
B: "Dermatologist-approved. Now in India."
C: "Skincare that actually works in Delhi heat"
BEST TIMES (IN): 7-9AM · 12-1PM · 7-9PM
BRAND TOKENS: #6D0000 · DM Sans · @glowskinofficial
```
**3. The Competitor Alert (10:00 AM)**
```
BRAND X — "Skin that survives Delhi heat"
Running since Aug 20 · ~$12-18K/week
Hook: survival · Offer: heat-proof · CTA: shop now
COUNTER-ANGLES (AI-generated):
① Clinical vs DIY: "Derms agree: $47 gel > $300 AC"
② Speed: "Results in 14 days or money back"
③ Transparency: "We list every active ingredient"
```
*See: [docs/assets/sample_brief.txt](docs/assets/sample_brief.txt)*
---
## Signal Calibration — The Proof
Most tools say "our signals are reliable." Marketic shows you:
```text
SIGNAL CALIBRATION — Last 30 Days
════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Source Signals Brier Verdict
────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Polymarket 12 0.09 ✅ Well-calibrated
Google Trends 8 0.14 ✅ Reliable
Hacker News 6 0.21 ⚠️ Uncertain
Reddit 9 0.28 ⚠️ Needs data
Twitter / X 14 0.31 ⚠️ Needs data
Product Hunt 5 0.24 ⚠️ Needs data
────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Overall 54 0.19 📊 Honest
Random baseline — 0.25 ───── ─────
════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Brier score: 0.00 = perfect · 0.25 = random · Higher = worse
```
**What this means:**
- Polymarket signals: right ~9 out of 10 times
- Twitter/X signals: 3 more weeks of data before we trust them
- This is the first marketing tool that tells you *how wrong it might be*
*See: [docs/assets/calibration_table.txt](docs/assets/calibration_table.txt)*
*See: [docs/assets/calibration.mmd](docs/assets/calibration.mmd) — pie chart*
---
## How It Works
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph SENSE["📡 SENSE"]
P[Polymarket]
G[Google Trends]
H[Hacker News]
R[Reddit]
X[X / Twitter]
Y[YouTube]
I[Indian RSS]
F[FB Ads Library]
end
subgraph THINK["🧠 THINK"]
EA[Ensemble AI]
SC[Scorecard]
BR[Budget Router]
AA[Ad Analyzer]
PS[Prospect Scout]
end
subgraph HANDOFF["📋 HANDOFF"]
BF[Brief JSON]
BT[Brand Tokens]
PW[Posting Windows]
end
subgraph LEARN["🔄 LEARN"]
AT[Audit Trail]
DS[Distillation]
BB[Brand Brain]
end
SENSE -->|"volume × P(YES)"| THINK
SENSE -->|"all signals"| SC
THINK -->|"scored signals"| EA
EA -->|"reasoned"| BR
EA -->|"ad insights"| AA
EA -->|"prospects"| PS
BR -->|"budget split"| BF
AA -->|"counter-angles"| BF
PS -->|"enriched leads"| BF
BF -->|"handoff"| HANDOFF
BT --> HANDOFF
PW --> HANDOFF
HANDOFF -->|"execute"| AT
AT -->|"patterns"| DS
DS -->|"approved rules"| BB
BB -->|"inject"| THINK
classDef sense fill:#6366f1,color:#fff,stroke:none
classDef think fill:#f59e0b,color:#fff,stroke:none
classDef handoff fill:#22c55e,color:#fff,stroke:none
classDef learn fill:#f43f5e,color:#fff,stroke:none
class P,G,H,R,X,Y,I,F sense
class EA,SC,BR,AA,PS think
class BF,BT,PW handoff
class AT,DS,BB learn
```
*See: [docs/assets/architecture.mmd](docs/assets/architecture.mmd)*
**Two design decisions worth knowing:**
1. **Polymarket: volume × P(YES)** — $2.1M at 4% = $84K effective, not $2.1M. Because 73.4% of all Polymarket markets resolve "No" historically. Raw volume overweights drama.
2. **Budget: margin-adjusted, not vanity-ROAS** — Email at 5× ROAS but 15% margin can lose to social at 1.5× ROAS but 85% margin. Marketic recommends where profit actually lands.
---
## 55 Tools Across 12 Categories
```mermaid
flowchart TB
subgraph GTM["🎯 GTM & Intel (20 tools)"]
A1[search_fb_ads] A2[analyze_competitor_ad]
A3[analyze_competitor] A4[analyze_positioning]
A5[breakdown_ad] A6[generate_narrative]
A7[discover_prospects] A8[signal_fanout]
A9[...]
end
subgraph CORE["⚙️ Core (12 tools)"]
B1[generate_creatives] B2[generate_social_posts]
B3[generate_seo_content] B4[build_campaign]
B5[optimize_budget] B6[launch_campaign_ad]
B7[generate_brief] B8[run_prospect_loop]
B9[distill_learnings] B10[ask_marketic]
end
subgraph DATA["📊 Data & Learning (13 tools)"]
C1[track_signal] C2[get_calibration_report]
C3[resolve_signal] C4[ensemble_vote]
C5[audit_log] C6[audit_get_log]
C7[get_cost_summary] C8[get_attribution]
C9[crm_leads/deals/pipeline/activities...]
end
subgraph PUB["🚀 Publishing & UGC (10 tools)"]
D1[schedule_content] D2[get_upcoming_posts]
D3[optimize_hashtags] D4[curate_ugc]
D5[request_ugc_permission] D6[track_ugc]
D7[render_template] D8[hub_*] D9[...]
end
classDef gtm fill:#6366f1,color:#fff,stroke:none
classDef core fill:#f59e0b,color:#fff,stroke:none
classDef data fill:#22c55e,color:#fff,stroke:none
classDef pub fill:#f43f5e,color:#fff,stroke:none
class A1,A2,A3,A4,A5,A6,A7,A8,A9 GTM
class B1,B2,B3,B4,B5,B6,B7,B8,B9,B10 CORE
class C1,C2,C3,C4,C5,C6,C7,C8,C9 DATA
class D1,D2,D3,D4,D5,D6,D7,D8,D9 PUB
```
*See: [docs/assets/tools.mmd](docs/assets/tools.mmd)*
| Category | Highlights |
|---|---|
| **Signal intelligence** | 9 sources: Polymarket · Google Trends IN · HN · Reddit · X · YouTube · Indian RSS · PH · FB Ads |
| **Competitor intel** | FB Ads Library search · Ad breakdown (hook/offer/CTA) · Positioning analysis |
| **Calibration** | Track signals → Resolve outcomes → Brier score per source |
| **Campaigns** | Full-funnel brief · Margin-aware budget · Narrative framing |
| **Prospecting** | ICP discovery (4 sources) + CRM enrichment loop |
| **Creative** | Copy variants · Social posts · SEO — scored by predicted performance |
| **Publishing** | Content calendar · Hashtag optimisation · Platform scheduling |
| **UGC** | Discover · Curate · Request permission · Track reposts |
| **Design** | Brand-as-data templates: one template, any brand |
| **CRM** | Leads · Deals · Pipeline · Activities |
| **Analytics** | 5-model attribution: first/last/linear/time-decay/data-driven |
| **Learning** | Audit trail → Distillation → Brand brain (markdown) |
---
## Quick Start
```bash
git clone https://github.com/Das-rebel/marketic
cd marketic && pip install -e .
python3 init_memory_db.py
# Your first briefing — no API keys needed for core loop
python3 daily_briefing.py "D2C skincare brand India"
```
| Optional Key | Adds |
|---|---|
| `FB_ACCESS_TOKEN` | Real competitor ad data from Facebook Ads Library |
| `SERPER_API_KEY` | ICP prospect discovery across Google/Twitter/Reddit/PH |
| `OLLAMA_BASE` | Free local AI models for creative generation |
---
## Open Source, MIT
Everything self-hosted. Your competitor data, your pipeline, your budget logic — stays yours.
```bash
git clone https://github.com/Das-rebel/marketic
```
---
## Learn More
| | |
|---|---|
| [`docs/BRIEF_SCHEMA.md`](docs/BRIEF_SCHEMA.md) | What's inside a campaign brief |
| [`docs/BRAIN_WORKFLOW.md`](docs/BRAIN_WORKFLOW.md) | How the learning loop compounds over time |
| [`docs/COUNCIL_ROUND2.md`](docs/COUNCIL_ROUND2.md) | Architecture decisions and why |
| [`API_DOCUMENTATION.md`](API_DOCUMENTATION.md) | All 55 tools, all parameters |
| [`docs/assets/`](docs/assets/) | Visual assets: Mermaid diagrams + ASCII, regenerate with `python3 docs/assets/generate_assets.py` |
MIT © Subho Das
TDQS
Scored across 54 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, with some overlap in competitor ad analysis (analyze_competitor_ad vs breakdown_ad) but descriptions differentiate them by use case and output. Signal-related tools (track_signal, collect_signals, signal_fanout) are also distinct in scope.
Tool naming is mostly snake_case with verb_noun patterns, but there are exceptions like 'ask_marketic', 'signal_fanout', and 'ensemble_vote' that break the pattern. Prefixes like hub_ and crm_ provide some consistency, but the mix of action verbs (get, create, launch, run) and occasional non-verb nouns is inconsistent.
With 54 tools, the server is extremely heavy. This far exceeds the typical well-scoped range (3-15) and even the 'too many' threshold of 25+. The vast count suggests a broad aggregation of marketing capabilities that would likely overwhelm an agent and cause selection difficulty.
The tool surface covers an impressively wide range of marketing functions: scheduling, UGC, CRM, analytics, competitor analysis, content generation, campaign management, and calibration. While some niche areas like A/B testing are absent, the core lifecycle of marketing operations (plan, create, launch, track, learn) is well covered.