Skip to main content
Glama
Darkjay123

rugradar

by Darkjay123
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to rugradar

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • safeagent-token-safety

      Aigen-Protocol
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Token safety oracle for AI agents. Honeypot detection, 17 scam pattern checks, LP lock verification across 6 EVM chains. Score 0-100 with risk flags. ERC Token Safety Score standard.
      1
      MIT

    • VetAgent

      jakegu1
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Pre-trade token safety check for AI agents. Simulates a sell before you buy, then reports honeypot, tax, liquidity, pair age, same-ticker impersonation and owner powers as one low/medium/high/unknown verdict. Fail-closed: when a critical check cannot run it answers unknown rather than guessing low. Publishes its own measured error rate with the benchmark harness in the repo.
      3
      MIT

    • VerdictSwarm MCP Server

      sentien-labs
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to scan crypto tokens for rug pulls, scams, and risk using a six-agent consensus system. It provides real-time security audits and risk scoring for tokens on Solana, Ethereum, Base, and BSC.
      6
      2
      MIT

    • web3-risk-mcp

      MelvTheGoat
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to assess the risk of crypto wallets, tokens, and smart contracts by providing read-only on-chain analysis, 0-100 risk scoring with explanations, fund tracing, and contract inspection before interaction.
      6
      MIT

    • ScamCheck MCP Server

      smijo-geek
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Scans suspicious messages, URLs, and text for scams inside any MCP-compatible AI assistant. No signup or API key needed for anonymous use.
      1
      228 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools have distinct purposes: check_token and scan_message both assess scams but differ in scope (network vs. text-only), and get_report vs. token_history retrieve different historical data. However, check_token's inclusion of message red flags creates minor overlap with scan_message, and both historical tools could be confused.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Four tools follow a verb_noun pattern (get_report, check_token, scan_message, explain_finding), but token_history uses a noun_noun pattern, a minor deviation. Overall consistent and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools are well-suited for a focused token scam checker; each covers a distinct need (checking, scanning, retrieving, explaining). No tools feel redundant or missing.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers token checking, message scanning, report retrieval, history, and finding explanations, which is comprehensive for the domain. Minor gap: no tool to list or search saved reports, but agents can work around it.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources