Skip to main content
Glama
DarkEden-coding

TreeSitter Code Structure MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to TreeSitter Code Structure MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Analyzes source code structure across multiple languages using tree-sitter, extracting classes, functions, methods, and metadata with precise line numbers for efficient codebase exploration and AI-assisted development.
      13
      697 PyPI
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Analyzes codebases and extracts all symbols (functions, classes, methods, interfaces, etc.) from 10+ programming languages into LLM-optimized markdown format. Enables AI assistants to understand entire project structures efficiently without processing full source code.
      2
      3 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to understand and navigate codebases through structural analysis. Provides code mapping, symbol search, and impact analysis using ast-grep for accurate parsing of Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, and Go projects.
      4
      52
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables token-efficient structural code exploration using tree-sitter AST parsing, with tools for symbol search, outlines, source unfolding, call graphs, and related-file discovery.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Gives coding agents structured code understanding via tree-sitter with 23 tools and 10 languages, enabling precise queries instead of reading entire files.
      23
      28
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool has a clear, singular purpose focused on analyzing code structure across multiple programming languages.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'analyze_code_structure' follows a clear verb_noun pattern and is descriptive. Since there is only one tool, consistency is inherently perfect with no deviations to assess.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool is too few for a server focused on code structure analysis, as it suggests an incomplete or overly simplistic surface. For a domain like code analysis, typical servers would include multiple tools for different aspects (e.g., parsing, querying, modifying).

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set is severely incomplete for the implied domain of code structure analysis. While the single tool provides analysis, there are obvious gaps such as tools for querying specific elements, modifying code, or handling other structural operations, which limits agent workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues