add_queue_consumer

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only says 'start consuming' with no details on side effects, idempotency, or what happens if already consuming. Output schema exists but is not clarified in description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no redundancy, but overly terse; could include brief param hints or usage context without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given two required parameters and no annotations, description lacks essential context: worker existence requirements, queue state, output behavior. Incomplete for reliable invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Parameters 'workername' and 'queue' have no description in schema or tool description. 0% schema coverage means the description adds no meaning beyond raw names.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb 'make' and resources 'worker' and 'queue', indicating starting consumption. Differentiates from sibling 'cancel_queue_consumer' which is the reverse operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites or context about worker state, and no warnings about preconditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.