kitty.ticket.create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says 'create,' implying a mutation, but offers no details about required permissions, side effects, idempotency, or what happens on success or failure. This is a significant gap for a create operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with no wasted words. It is front-loaded and easy to scan, though it lacks detail. It earns high marks for conciseness even if it sacrifices completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 7 parameters and no output schema, so the description should provide more context about the creation process, parameter roles, and return values. It doesn't explain side effects, relationship to sibling tools, or required inputs beyond 'in a project.' This is inadequate for a tool of this complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 14% (only projectSlug is documented). The description adds no parameter details beyond implying the ticket belongs to a project. Seven parameters, including title, status, assignee, and priority, are left entirely unexplained, and the description does not compensate for the low schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states a specific verb ('Create'), a resource ('a new ticket'), and a context ('in a project'), which distinguishes it from sibling tools like updates and comments. It is unambiguous and immediately conveys the tool's primary function.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as kitty.ticket.create_subtask or kitty.ticket.update_description. It simply states the action without exclusions, prerequisites, or contextual cues for appropriate use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.