uipath_get_machines

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It fails to mention pagination (skip/limit), default limits, whether it's read-only, or what the response format is. The verb 'Get' implies read-only but nothing else is disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence with no filler, making it highly concise. However, it is not structured beyond that and lacks any additional detail, so while concise, it is not exemplary.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, so the description should explain the return value, but it doesn't. It also fails to provide context about the tool's behavior, leaving the agent without essential information about pagination and response structure.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema fully describes the two parameters (skip, limit) with types, defaults, and descriptions, giving 100% coverage. The description adds no additional parameter context, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: 'Get machines from UiPath Orchestrator.' It uses a specific verb and resource, distinguishing it from other getter tools like get_robots or get_sessions. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate itself beyond the resource name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no mention of use cases, prerequisites, or exclusions. The description simply states the action without any contextual clues.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.