NixOS MCP Server
Enables searching for NixOS configuration options to retrieve details such as option names, types, default values, and descriptions from the official NixOS search API.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@NixOS MCP Serverfind the configuration options for nginx services"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
NixOS MCP Server
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables searching NixOS configuration options directly from Claude Code.
Features
Search NixOS configuration options by keyword or phrase
Returns option names, types, default values, and descriptions
Pagination support for large result sets
Built with TypeScript and compatible with Node 24+
Related MCP server: mcp-nix
Requirements
Node.js 24 or later (for native TypeScript support)
npm or yarn
Installation
Clone the repository:
cd /path/to/nixos-mcp
npm installConfiguration for Claude Code
To use this MCP server with Claude Code, you need to configure it in Claude Code's configuration file.
Linux/macOS
Edit ~/.config/claude/claude_code_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"nixos-search": {
"command": "node",
"args": [
"/absolute/path/to/nixos-mcp/src/index.ts"
]
}
}
}Windows
Edit %APPDATA%\claude\claude_code_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"nixos-search": {
"command": "node",
"args": [
"C:\\absolute\\path\\to\\nixos-mcp\\src\\index.ts"
]
}
}
}Restart Claude Code
After adding the configuration, restart Claude Code for the MCP server to be loaded.
Usage
Once configured, you can search NixOS options directly from Claude Code. Here are some example queries:
"Search for nginx options in NixOS"
"Find networking firewall configuration options"
"What NixOS options are available for SSH?"
"Search for services.postgresql options"
Available Tool
search_nixos_options
Searches NixOS configuration options.
Parameters:
query(string, required): Search query for NixOS optionsExamples: "nginx", "networking firewall", "services.postgresql"
from(number, optional): Starting index for paginationDefault: 0
Use this to fetch subsequent pages of results
size(number, optional): Number of results per pageDefault: 20
Range: 1-50
Example:
search_nixos_options {
query: "nginx services",
size: 10
}Response Format:
Found X results for "query":
1. option.name.here
Type: string
Default: "default value"
Description: Description of the option...
2. another.option.name
Type: boolean
Default: false
Description: Another option description...
---
Showing results 1-10 of X totalDevelopment
Run the Server Locally
To test the server without configuring Claude Code:
npm startCode Quality
Format code:
npm run formatType check:
npm run typecheckFeatures
Efficient Search: Uses the official NixOS search API endpoint
NixOS 25.11: Searches against the latest NixOS channel (25.11)
Type-Safe: Full TypeScript type definitions
Validated Input: Zod schema validation for all inputs
Error Handling: Graceful error messages for invalid queries or API issues
Pagination Support: Handle large result sets efficiently
Architecture
src/
├── index.ts # MCP server entry point
├── types.ts # TypeScript type definitions
├── nixos-client.ts # NixOS API client
└── tools/
└── search-options.ts # Search tool implementationTroubleshooting
Server won't start
Ensure you have Node 24 or later:
node --versionCheck that the path to
src/index.tsis correct in the configurationLook for error messages in Claude Code's MCP server logs
No results found
Try more specific search terms
Use common NixOS option names or prefixes (e.g., "services.nginx", "networking")
Check the NixOS search portal for reference
Connection issues
Make sure the config file syntax is valid JSON
Verify the absolute path is correct
Restart Claude Code after updating the configuration
API Details
This server uses the official NixOS search API:
Endpoint:
https://search.nixos.org/backend/latest-44-nixos-25.11/_searchChannel: NixOS 25.11
Type: Only searches configuration options (not packages)
License
ISC
Available Tools
2 toolssearch_nixos_optionsB
Search for NixOS configuration options by query. Returns matching options with their types, defaults, and descriptions.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | Search query for NixOS options (e.g., 'networking firewall', 'services nginx') | |
| from | No | Starting index for pagination (default: 0) | |
| size | No | Number of results to return (1-50, default: 20) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions the return format ('matching options with their types, defaults, and descriptions'), which is helpful, but doesn't cover important aspects like rate limits, authentication needs, error handling, or whether the search is case-sensitive. For a search tool with zero annotation coverage, this leaves significant gaps.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, well-structured sentence that efficiently conveys the tool's purpose and return values. Every word earns its place, with no redundancy or unnecessary details. It's front-loaded with the core functionality.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's moderate complexity (search with pagination), no annotations, and no output schema, the description is adequate but incomplete. It covers the basic purpose and return format, but lacks details on behavioral traits, usage context, and error handling. It meets minimum viability but has clear gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all parameters thoroughly. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond what's in the schema—it doesn't explain query syntax, pagination behavior, or result ordering. Baseline 3 is appropriate when the schema does the heavy lifting.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the specific action ('Search for NixOS configuration options'), the resource ('NixOS configuration options'), and distinguishes from the sibling tool 'search_nix_packages' by specifying it's about configuration options rather than packages. It's precise and unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. While it implicitly suggests using it for searching NixOS options, there's no explicit mention of when not to use it or what other tools might be better for related tasks. It lacks context about prerequisites or typical use cases.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
search_nix_packagesB
Search for Nix packages by query. Returns matching packages with their versions, descriptions, and maintainers.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | Search query for Nix packages (e.g., 'python', 'vim', 'firefox') | |
| from | No | Starting index for pagination (default: 0) | |
| size | No | Number of results to return (1-50, default: 20) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It mentions what the tool returns (packages with versions, descriptions, maintainers) but lacks important behavioral details like whether this is a read-only operation, if it requires authentication, rate limits, pagination behavior beyond the parameters, or error conditions. The description provides basic output information but misses key operational context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise with just two sentences that efficiently convey the core functionality and return values. Every word earns its place with zero wasted text. The structure is front-loaded with the primary purpose followed by output details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a search tool with 3 parameters, 100% schema coverage, but no annotations and no output schema, the description provides basic purpose and output information. However, it lacks important context about behavioral traits, error handling, and usage guidelines. The description is minimally adequate but has clear gaps in completeness given the tool's complexity and lack of supporting structured data.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already fully documents all three parameters. The description doesn't add any parameter-specific information beyond what's in the schema. It mentions searching 'by query' which aligns with the 'query' parameter but doesn't provide additional semantic context. The baseline of 3 is appropriate when the schema does all the parameter documentation work.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Search for Nix packages by query' with the verb 'search' and resource 'Nix packages'. It distinguishes from the sibling tool 'search_nixos_options' by specifying packages rather than options. However, it doesn't explicitly mention the sibling differentiation in the text itself.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There's no mention of the sibling tool 'search_nixos_options' or any other potential alternatives. The description simply states what the tool does without contextual usage information.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
2 tool updates
- First observed
search_nix_packages - First observed
search_nixos_options
TDQS
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one searches for NixOS configuration options, while the other searches for Nix packages. There is no overlap in functionality, and the descriptions explicitly differentiate between options (with types, defaults) and packages (with versions, maintainers).
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'search_' as the prefix, followed by the specific domain ('nixos_options' and 'nix_packages'). The naming is predictable and adheres to snake_case throughout, making it easy to understand the tool's purpose at a glance.
With only two tools, the server feels thin for a domain as broad as NixOS/Nix package management. While the tools cover searching for options and packages, there are likely many other operations (e.g., installing packages, managing configurations) that are missing, making the toolset under-scoped for the apparent purpose.
The toolset is severely incomplete for a NixOS/Nix package management server. It only provides search functionality, with no tools for CRUD operations like installing packages, updating configurations, or managing system states. This creates significant gaps that will hinder agents from performing common workflows in this domain.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Search GitHub, npm, PyPI, StackOverflow, ArXiv from one MCP — built for coding agents.
Search public open-source code, documentation, metadata, vulnerabilities, changelogs, and examples.
Agentic search over your Dewey document collections from any MCP-compatible client.
Provides metadata information to AI agents through the search API.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search documentation of packages and services to find implementation details, examples, and specifications.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceAccess the Nix ecosystem (Nixpkgs, NixOS, Home Manager, nix-darwin, nixvim, nixhub...)7GPL 3.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceIntegrates a remote smart search API to provide powerful web search capabilities with structured JSON results. It allows users to perform filtered searches with configurable parameters like result count and pagination.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI-powered code search using natural language queries via the Exa API. Provides configurable search results with rich metadata.1,0753MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/DanielRamosAcosta/nixos-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server