A
licenseA
qualityA
maintenanceHosted memory for AI agents that learns from outcomes, with shared rooms. One key across Claude, Cursor & ChatGPT.
11
707 npm
28
MIT
contradiction-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to contradiction-mcp
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceContradiction detector and belief repairer for multi-source facts — ensures knowledge-base consistency across agent sessions.MIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenancePersistent decision memory and contradiction detection for AI coding agents. Enforces architectural consistency across sessions — the agent cannot code until it loads prior decisions. Human resolves conflicts on a dashboard or in chat.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents and developers to independently verify code and documentation claims against the repository, producing evidence-backed audit reports and pull-request checks.14MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceShared, versioned memory and governance control plane for AI coding agents. Compiler pipeline resolves architectural decision conflicts across Claude Code, Cursor, and custom agent fleets.36MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables agentic coding tools to maintain a living, in-repo model of intent, architecture, and code, with deterministic indexing, bidirectional linking, and continuous drift detection for task-scoped context and reconciliation.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceScans markdown vaults to detect contradictory claims (quantitative and negation) between notes with high concept overlap, and provides tools for analysis and reconciliation.424 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to map cross-repository dependencies, detect breaking changes in API contracts, and assess impact across services.10MIT
TDQS
A4.2/5.0
Scored across 12 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: health check, source management, claim inspection/analysis, and conflict discovery/triage/resolution. The descriptions clearly separate the overlapping analysis tools (claims.analyze vs conflicts.advise) by their output purpose.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow the same dot-separated namespace pattern: contradiction.<resource>.<action>. The action verbs are consistently lowercase and descriptive, creating a predictable and uniform naming convention across the entire toolset.
Tool Count5/5
The 12 tools are well-scoped for a contradiction management service. Each tool serves a clear purpose within source ingestion, claim inspection, conflict scanning, or resolution, with no redundancy or excessive expansion.
Completeness4/5
The core workflow is well covered: source sync/test, claim retrieval/analysis, conflict discovery/listing/advice/resolution. The only notable gaps are the absence of delete or update operations for sources and claims, but these are not essential for the server's primary contradiction-management purpose.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessLimited data