A
licenseA
qualityA
maintenancePersistent long-term memory for AI agents — semantic recall across Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT & MCP.
10
122
21
MIT
contradiction-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to contradiction-mcp
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceContradiction detector and belief repairer for multi-source facts — ensures knowledge-base consistency across agent sessions.MIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenancePersistent decision memory and contradiction detection for AI coding agents. Enforces architectural consistency across sessions — the agent cannot code until it loads prior decisions. Human resolves conflicts on a dashboard or in chat.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceShared, versioned memory and governance control plane for AI coding agents. Compiler pipeline resolves architectural decision conflicts across Claude Code, Cursor, and custom agent fleets.36MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables agentic coding tools to maintain a living, in-repo model of intent, architecture, and code, with deterministic indexing, bidirectional linking, and continuous drift detection for task-scoped context and reconciliation.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to map cross-repository dependencies, detect breaking changes in API contracts, and assess impact across services.10MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAI Constraint Engine that enforces CLAUDE.md, .cursorrules, and AGENTS.md rules as laws. 51 MCP tools for semantic conflict detection, patch review, drift scoring, pre-commit hooks, and Guardian Mode. Catches euphemisms, temporal evasion, and hidden violations that keyword matching misses.5225MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceReal-time agentic sentinel & breaking-change intelligence server for AI agents (Cursor, Hermes, Claude, LangChain).4-
TDQS
B3.3/5.0
Scored across 22 tools
Disambiguation3/5
Several tools overlap heavily: sync_source, sync_sources, sync_github_repository, sync_document, and sync_website all ingest sources, with the unified sync_source making specialized syncs ambiguous; similarly scan_for_contradictions, scan_claim_for_contradictions, and scan_source_for_contradictions differ mainly in scope. Descriptions help, but an agent could still misselect among sync/scan variants.
Naming Consistency4/5
Nearly all names use snake_case verb_noun or verb_noun_phrase patterns such as list_contradictions, resolve_contradiction, and sync_website, with a minor exception like health_check. The convention is predictable, though scan_for_contradictions slightly breaks the verb_noun shape.
Tool Count3/5
22 tools is borderline heavy for the scope; the contradiction domain is complex, but several source-sync and scan tools could be consolidated. It earns most places, yet the count sits at the upper edge of reasonable.
Completeness4/5
The server covers ingestion, contradiction detection, pair analysis, resolution lifecycle, audit history, and connector health. Gaps remain around direct claim/source management such as listing, getting, or deleting claims and sources, but core contradiction workflows are complete.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues