dakera_load_tools

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses the output behavior in detail: it returns schemas for found tools and a not_found list for unrecognized names. This transparency about both success and failure cases exceeds typical descriptions and is fully transparent for a read-only operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, consisting of two sentences that directly state the function, usage timing, and output behavior. Every word serves a purpose, with no extraneous information or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool that fetches schemas, the description provides all necessary context: what it does, when to use it (after discover_tools), and what it returns (schemas plus not_found list). No additional information is needed for an agent to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter 'tools' is described as 'Tool names to load schemas for', which clearly explains its purpose and format. The schema description is comprehensive, and the tool description adds no ambiguity. Coverage is 100%.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool fetches the full inputSchema for one or more named tools, using specific verb 'Fetch' and resource 'tools'. It also distinguishes itself from siblings by specifying 'Use after dakera_discover_tools' and describing the return behavior.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly instructs when to use the tool ('Use after dakera_discover_tools'), providing clear timing guidance. It also implies it is the appropriate tool for loading schemas, while other tools like search or extract serve different purposes.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.