Skip to main content
Glama
Daichi-Kudo

LLM-Adviser-Mcp

by Daichi-Kudo
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to LLM-Adviser-Mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Index9 MCP Server

      index9-org
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Provides AI assistants with real-time access to 1000+ AI models including their latest pricing, context windows, capabilities, and specifications. Supports model search, comparison, recommendations, and live testing.
      3
      61 npm
      1
      MIT
    • Modelglass by Modelglass

      Modelglassofficial

      Modelglass
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Live, sourced pricing and benchmark data across image, language, video, and audio AI models, seven tools for comparison, competitor lookups, and cost-aware routing. Also powers the free Modelglass VS Code extension.
      1
      MIT

    • APIPoints MCP Server

      myloadcircle
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables real-time access to LLM pricing, benchmarks, deprecation alerts, and cost optimization for over 30 models across 8 providers, allowing AI agents to make cost-effective model selections.
      -

    • Model Price Watch

      romanshumy
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Live LLM API pricing: current token prices, model comparisons, cheapest-model lookups, and The LLM Price Index for 150+ models across 20+ providers, re-verified daily. No API key required.
      4
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: compare_models for side-by-side comparisons, get_model_info for detailed single-model data, list_top_models for category-based rankings, and recommend_model for personalized suggestions. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their functions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case (e.g., compare_models, get_model_info). The verbs are distinct and appropriate for each action, making the naming predictable and readable throughout the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of advising on LLM/VLM models. Each tool earns its place by covering key aspects: comparison, detailed info, rankings, and recommendations, without being too sparse or bloated.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface provides complete coverage for the domain of LLM/VLM model advising. It includes tools for comparison, detailed retrieval, categorical listing, and personalized recommendations, covering all essential workflows without obvious gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources